We've already done this one. The numbers of low paid immigrants that place demand on publics services is less and less balanced out by the wealthier who pay more. A low paid couple or single parent are taking more than they give if they send a child to school which alone costs the taxpayers over £3K a year. It's a completely false argument when the key figured relate to the collective population where tax receipts are far far lower than what needs spending on public services. There is a shift to low paid, low skilled jobs in the service industry and the likes of Starbucks and Hilton are panicking about their ready supply of low skilled, cheap labour.
But thats also true of natives. Someone who earns a fuckload of money will likely get to the end of their life having paid loads more in tax than they've taken in services. Someone who is at the opposite end of the scale will be in 'debit'. Yet despite that society copes just fine.
Why is it that immigration breaks that, given that we know that immigrants tend to contribute more than they take?