Hard border - IRA back active. Shit storm
NI leaves union - UDA, UVF and co back active. Shit storm.
So the UK has to remain part of the EU because otherwise the Irish will start killing each other again?
Hard border - IRA back active. Shit storm
NI leaves union - UDA, UVF and co back active. Shit storm.
The EU arent being cunts. They're just using their power to negotiate on behalf of their members.....kinda like a union...
The EU arent being cunts. They're just using their power to negotiate on behalf of their members.....kinda like a union...
Absolutely - the loss of the UK is not good news for them. I would imagine right now Mr VW, Mr Peugeot et al are knocking on their doors shitting themselves that their cars are going to become far more expensive to sell in the UK. The negotiations were going nowhere and Johnson played his final card. Desperate, totally avoidable measures following a three year farce in Westminster.
If leaving the EU is going to cost any lives then surely staying in the EU is worth it?So the UK has to remain part of the EU because otherwise the Irish will start killing each other again?
Would be interesting- we could do with a centrist party. Will only happen though if the no deal happens and then the likes of Hammond do it. I can’t see it though, it takes a long time to give up hope in a party you’ve been a big part of for years - took omuna and the others quite a while to leave labour despite all the efforts to unseat Jezza failing.
It’s a shame the TIG idiots muffed it up so badly tbh
you are literally describing your own "economic utopia" and with no substance about how it can be achieved. this is delusional. read the first part of your first sentence.
repeating soundbites will not make them reality
no prominent brexiteer is proposing a different economic model unless you can tell me differently? so you will simply strengthen corporate bargaining positions and get more of the same, dressed up to be socially acceptable and economic by whichever party has had the nod from the nation and backed by whichever media they are in the pocket of.
The leave vote infers the UK has complete autonomy. The back-stop does not give the UK autonomy - it would have left the UK as a vassal state. If the UK had stayed in the customs union, single market etc etc it had not left the EU. The vote was to leave, not stay half in .... the fact they had three years to strike a new deal, a new relationship which they had abysmally failed at - therefore the blame lies fairly and squarely with May and those who refuse/d to accept the mandate given in the referendum ( a vote by the people of this country that has not been delivered ). Westminster is there to serve and enact the will of the people.
The leave vote inferred nothing of the sort. Any deal with the EU requires the loss of a degree of autonomy and leave could be anything from remaining a.memner of the single market and customs union to a complete cessation of all and any ties. Only the latter gives complete autonomy and that is arguable.
You are also misrepresenting Parliament which is a representative democracy where we hand decision making powers to elected representatives to take these decisions on out behalf. At best this is based on a loose commitment in a manifesto but certainly not a requirement to "enact the will of the people". .
Hmmm. Last time I looked neither the IRA or UDA or indeed the INLA limited themselves to killing Irish people. But I’m sure you know that.
Yes, fully aware. I'm not entirely sure people would want to kill others because the EU requires EIRE to uphold the credibility of the single market. Both the Irish and UK governments have stated there will be no physical checks at the border. The ball is in the EU's court ..
Precisely.
The Irish politicians (I wont call them 'government) and the EU are quite prepared to sacrifice their own people on a point of principal though. Playing with peoples lives and livelihoods whilst feathering their own nests.
It's one thing for the UK government to say they don't want a hard border, it's a completely different thing for them to find a way to make that a reality.
If there isn't a UK/EU customs union then there has to be a hard border, so the UK refusing the former means they can't promise the lack of the latter. They're talking bollocks, claiming the EU are being obstructive and too many people are lapping it up.
It's one thing for the UK government to say they don't want a hard border, it's a completely different thing for them to find a way to make that a reality.
If there isn't a UK/EU customs union then there has to be a hard border, so the UK refusing the former means they can't promise the lack of the latter. They're talking bollocks, claiming the EU are being obstructive and too many people are lapping it up.
How would that work and what would it look like?
No fluff, be exact please.