i'd have described myself a reluctant remainer. the main problems i had with leave were specifically the people who were "championing" the cause, the degree of complete lies and bullshit they speak and the lack of any path or plan to demonstrate a better society would be created as a result. i thought little would change only we'd be worse off to some degree. providing the worse off isn't too great, i can live with that, but at present that looks like a pretty fucking huge proviso. the wider political ramifications of a nastier society, a revived Russia and their shenanigans further undermining 'democracies' with nobody standing up to them, along with numerous other business, NI ... concerns is also disturbing. i mean as an ideological anarchist there's a part of me sort of loving the whole mess, but i don't see it as a path to success.
the problem really is that within the voting block "Leave", inevitably there will be groups of people that want or believe in different things. in the same way that it would be wrong to describe all leavers as xenophobic or various other things, it's also wrong that essentially a minority group such as ERG categorically can state that a hard brexit is the will of the people. the binary vote allows them to get away with that. and what's going on behind the scenes is simply a political power struggle with the strength of largely that minority putting the squeeze on. if we end up with a hard brexit they will be quite happy with the mess won't they?
i can have some sympathy for cyber for not knowing who would be in control, there was a leadership contest after all. but i don't have much sympathy if you look at the candidates and what the direction of travel may have been under each. you may have ended up in the same position regardless. and it was obvious there was going to be a huge uncertainty from a leave vote. if you vote for uncertainty, you can't justifiably complain when you get it.