• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

REFERENDUM RESULTS AND DISCUSSION THREAD

I missed out the second clause because it was not relevant to the point I was making. It is still not relevant to the point I am making and it never will be relevant to the point I was making. Even if I had included the second clause, I would not have changed the point I was making. My point stands as is, as I have explained it and as others have recognised.

Bollocks.
 
Since reading the last two pages of this thread, my brain hurts. Not sure if that is because we are in/out of the EU though
 
Yay! safe to have a proper discussion again :)

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/article-50-author-lord-kerr-of-kinlochard-brexit-latest-news-warning-disastrous-consequences-a7846951.html

Article 50 author calls for Brexit to be halted with a warning of ‘disastrous consequences’...
“We see our society, economy and politics becoming ever more undermined due to the impact of Brexit. We recognise that a narrow majority voted to leave the European Union, but the disastrous consequences are now becoming ever clearer - every day,” the letter says.

“Even before the UK has left the EU, we face falling living standards, rising inflation, slowing growth and lower productivity.

“Our international reputation has been seriously damaged, leaving the UK weak, with diminished influence, in an increasingly uncertain and unstable world.
 
Its not exactly odd that the last 10 years have resulted in much more rules on financial companies. I mean, its hardly as if they single-handedly tried to bankrupt us 10 years ago is it....?

The other examples are fishing (cod has only just recovered from over fishing), ports and art dealing (one of the last refuges of the money launderer)
 
Its not exactly odd that the last 10 years have resulted in much more rules on financial companies. I mean, its hardly as if they single-handedly tried to bankrupt us 10 years ago is it....?

The other examples are fishing (cod has only just recovered from over fishing), ports and art dealing (one of the last refuges of the money launderer)

If you take industries like coal, steel and many others out of the 'blame EU' equation there isn't really much that I could personally thank the EU for or more importantly give me any inkling of great times ahead. I'm more for competition and innovation rather than protectionism. I saw somebody blaming Brexit because his flowers costs more to import - surely somebody can grow them in this country far cheaper? I saw Brexit as opportunity rather than continued stagnation ..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...red-15billion-extra-foreign-investment-since/
 
If you take industries like coal, steel and many others out of the 'blame EU' equation there isn't really much that I could personally thank the EU for or more importantly give me any inkling of great times ahead. I'm more for competition and innovation rather than protectionism. I saw somebody blaming Brexit because his flowers costs more to import - surely somebody can grow them in this country far cheaper? I saw Brexit as opportunity rather than continued stagnation ..

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...red-15billion-extra-foreign-investment-since/

I'd forgotten about your tulip obsession :)

This is why *everything* is more expensive to import:

cwyW2Rp.png


You can only blame brexit for the never ending downfall of our currency. Conversely the death of our manufacturing industry has very little to do with the EU and much more to do with our successive governments prioritising short term capital growth via financial services over long term investment in manufacturing, we are reaping the results of thatcherism.
 
Is it not a good thing that the EU is ready to impose sanctions on a member country that wants to diminish the independence of the judiciary? It is one of the major principles of Western democracy and a fundamental principle of the EU. I can't for the life of me see why the EU should turn a blind eye to it.

Too much dictatorship over Countries will see the end of the EU.
 
But Poland is going against fundamental values of the EU. The whole point of the EU is Union. If one country is buggering about on fundamental values then surely it should be called to order by the rest of the nations?
 
But Poland is going against fundamental values of the EU. The whole point of the EU is Union. If one country is buggering about on fundamental values then surely it should be called to order by the rest of the nations?

I don't know a lot about it, but weren't remainers on here saying that Countries still have their own sovereignty?
 
This isn't really about sovereignty.

The EU isn't saying thet poland cannot implement laws that are against democratic values. However, if Poland does implement such laws then the rights that Poland enjoys as a member of the Union will be diminished.

It would then be Poland's sovereign right to decide on whether or not to remain in the Union.
 
Back
Top