Well your point is an opinion, it's not a fact is it? And not one i agree with.Quality I’m not sure. We are more open and attacking, hence we create more. My point is (which you keep ignoring) is we are over-performing just like we did that year under Bruno.
GON is a lot more likeable than that idiot so people are likely to give him more benefit of the doubt (which is fine). Doesn’t mask some of the things he’s getting wrong, in my eyes anyway.
I’m moaning because we’ve been rubbish. He wasn’t brave enough to put the starters he should have. That’s on him.
I never said it was a fact. I think we’ve definitely over performed, as much as I think we’ve improved more recently. I think our position is slightly false.Well your point is an opinion, it's not a fact is it? And not one i agree with.
In terms of who he should have played, i think it's easy for us to say he should have brought RAN in etc (and i would have too) but there must be a fine line between motivating players by telling them they earn the shirt with performances and dropping them after they've played well (Doyle). It's much more than names on a piece of paper.
Both Doyle and Doc have played well in recent games, just taking them out isn't as easy as we suggest (though i am surprised given the volume and intensity of games this week)
I mean, if he’d made the changes I Assume you want there’s no guarantee it would be totally different. Could easily be saying ‘we shouldn’t have changed the team’ in that caseQuality I’m not sure. We are more open and attacking, hence we create more. My point is (which you keep ignoring) is we are over-performing just like we did that year under Bruno.
GON is a lot more likeable than that idiot so people are likely to give him more benefit of the doubt (which is fine). Doesn’t mask some of the things he’s getting wrong, in my eyes anyway.
I’m moaning because we’ve been rubbish. He wasn’t brave enough to put the starters he should have. That’s on him.
No. He's having a reasonable game in an Adama or Podence kind of way. ie outside of the game plan and system doing his own thing.I don't think Bellegarde is playing badly?
I agree generally, but i can understand why there are circumstances sometimes where you do give well performing players another go, else you potentially shatter them.I never said it was a fact. I think we’ve definitely over performed, as much as I think we’ve improved more recently. I think our position is slightly false.
You play your best team. A more experience or stronger coach knows that I think .
You have a good point but there is such a thing as stupidity in expecting the team that comfortably beat WBA would compete against a rampant Utd. Playing Doc on the left side has no rationale about it. Playing Bellegarde at all, similar. Sometimes you have to be patient and keep things tight. We've been open all the half and have done nothing to change it.Well your point is an opinion, it's not a fact is it? And not one i agree with.
In terms of who he should have played, i think it's easy for us to say he should have brought RAN in etc (and i would have too) but there must be a fine line between motivating players by telling them they earn the shirt with performances and dropping them after they've played well (Doyle). It's much more than names on a piece of paper.
Both Doyle and Doc have played well in recent games, just taking them out isn't as easy as we suggest (though i am surprised given the volume and intensity of games this week)