• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Live Match Discussion 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
To be fair Leicester's transfers have always been more than a bit overrated. Bought plenty of shite along the way even when they were doing well in terms of league position. Like Slimani was about £30m straight after they won the league and he was rubbish.
When you dive in yep agree but the likes of Mahrez and Kante made everyone want their club to do similar and of course the the PL win and the cost of the squad etc meant it was a media wet dream

Vardy is a good one, they paid £1m for him which in footballing terms is brilliant value especially considering what he has done for them but when they signed him he was a NL forward and they got a lot of shit for paying that much for him
 
Musa (17.5m), Slimani (30m) Silva (20m), Iborra (15m) Mendy (15m), Soumare (20m), Faes (15m), Soyuncu (20m) , Daka (27m), Vestergaard (16m), Ayoze (30m), Praet (19m), Benkovic (14.5), Ghezzal (14m), Ward (14m), Iheanacho (25m).

Grim, grim stuff.
 
We paid £28m for Guedes, £35m for Silva, £15m for Hwang and £13m for Hoever.

We've been almost as shite.
 
Post winning the league, Leicester were held up as the blueprint for teams outside the big 6, before that you had examples like Swansea and Southampton, all will be in the Championship next season.

Brighton and Brentford are the current examples, and their recruitment has been very good to be fair to them but I don't expect it to last for very long, and some of their fans I have seen seem to understand that too. The issue is clubs in these positions never last there that long because there's only a finite amount of times you can replace your best players that get poached with cheaper alternatives and it pay off, if you do have a longer period where it works, the recruitment staff usually get poached.

There's not really a secret formula to having sustained periods of time in the Premier League (with successful seasons thrown in,) it just needs deep pockets and the hope that you don't make too many big mistakes in a short period of time, as anyone from 8th down can go down in any given season.
 
I assume given their owners background that Brentford's recruitment is heavily stats based? If so could easily see those people staying in place long term as they almost certainly wouldn't get the same level of input at bigger clubs.
 
Post winning the league, Leicester were held up as the blueprint for teams outside the big 6, before that you had examples like Swansea and Southampton, all will be in the Championship next season.

Brighton and Brentford are the current examples, and their recruitment has been very good to be fair to them but I don't expect it to last for very long, and some of their fans I have seen seem to understand that too. The issue is clubs in these positions never last there that long because there's only a finite amount of times you can replace your best players that get poached with cheaper alternatives and it pay off, if you do have a longer period where it works, the recruitment staff usually get poached.

There's not really a secret formula to having sustained periods of time in the Premier League (with successful seasons thrown in,) it just needs deep pockets and the hope that you don't make too many big mistakes in a short period of time, as anyone from 8th down can go down in any given season.
The owners of Brentford and Brighton have a huge advantage over the other owners in that they understand stats on a personal level and hire accordingly.

I wouldn't trust Jeff to hire a cherry picker.
 
Last edited:
The owners of Brentford and Brighton have a huge advantage over the other owners in that they understand stats on a personal level and his accordingly.

I wouldn't trust Jeff to hire a cherry picker.
Quite telling that Benham didn't really put up any resistance to Ankersen jumping ship and going to Southampton. His "data-driven" approach hasn't quite panned out there.
 
I was finding the CL game between Inter and Milan too stop/start, so I've switched to Luton v Sunderland. Far more exciting.
 
I was finding the CL game between Inter and Milan too stop/start, so I've switched to Luton v Sunderland. Far more exciting.
Its reminding me of those sunny May evenings at Molineux in the 90s, play off games that always ended in failure and disappointment
 
I was finding the CL game between Inter and Milan too stop/start, so I've switched to Luton v Sunderland. Far more exciting.
I like how the pitchside mics are picking up all the fruity language and Sky have stopped apologising for it.
 
Ar.

Entertaining match this. Very low on quality - both teams are turning the ball over constantly - but an enjoyable watch nonetheless.
 
Its reminding me of those sunny May evenings at Molineux in the 90s, play off games that always ended in failure and disappointment

Evening singular!

Bolton in 95 was a Sunday lunchtime.
 
I assume Norwich doesn't count as it wasn't in the 90s?
 
I've been really disappointed with Sunderland. Luton have bullied them all over the pitch.
 
Oh my goodness what was that. Goalkeeper went up for the corner and Luton missed an open goal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top