Tredman
Salted Caramel Edition
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Messages
- 25,330
- Reaction score
- 11,477
Even the Times journalists seem to be fed up of their lying
All good points. My sister took four attempts to pass her maths O level after three Ds. The prospect of having to do more maths would almost certainly have lead her to drop out of 6th form She’s just retired after a career as an Occupational Therapist and not once has she needed more maths education. By all means encourage people to study maths but heed the fact you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink. Even voicing the idea shows how out of touch Rishi is with the real world.Rishi Sunak to propose maths for all pupils up to age 18
PM to set out plan to enhance numeracy for pupils in England in first policy speech of 2023www.theguardian.com
This doesn't work, dickhead. For a number of reasons.
1) A C+ GCSE pass will give you a decent level of numeracy, and that is what you are after. If you must target the teaching and exams more down that road (rather than say, a lot of trigonometry, which I know we did and I basically haven't used in the intervening 25 years) then do so
2) People have a natural plateau with maths, I'm not *that* thick and glancing at mates' A-Level stuff in the late 90s...I wouldn't have had a clue. Miles over my head. I'm just not geared to understand that kind of stuff, let alone make it have a purpose in the real world
3) What if a 16-17 year old doesn't want to do maths any more, how are you going to make them try. They're stubborn buggers, you know
4) So you chuck this pointless extra two years in there - anyone who wants to do Maths can and does - equals less time to dedicate to subjects you actually are good at and want to do
5) For a decade now we have not had as many Maths teachers as targeted, and the numbers aren't getting better, to put it lightly, so who's in charge of the massively expanded classes
That was the bit I found laughable.Says in the paper he’s not planning to bring it until 2029. More chance of me being prime
minister then than him.
The contempt the Tories have for teachers is disgusting. I don’t think Sunak is a particularly ‘nasty’ guy, it’s just unthinking disregard they have for these and many other professions and it’s lamentable.My wife is a maths teacher at a secondary school. This is such a ridiculously unworkable idea - and yet again shows how totally out of touch with reality these wankers really are. It will increase the strain on teachers (who are already up against it due to a severe lack of funding - can't quite figure out who is responsible for this....) and will also create totally unnecessary extra stress for students, a lot of whom struggle to reach pass grades at GCSE anyway.
I wonder if they ever actually consider speaking to or gauging the opinion of those actually involved in teaching, rather than spewing out such uneducated bullshit to try and get people onside?
Rhetorical question, I know.
I really fucking hate this government.
There's definitely a mixture of both IMO - he wouldn't be in the position he's in within that horrendous party if he wasn't a total cunt. Speaks volumes that he's not the worst of them mind you.I don’t think Sunak is a particularly ‘nasty’ guy, it’s just unthinking disregard they have for these and many other professions and it’s lamentable.
I've never understood this. I've sadly met plenty of these types and to a man (and you're right they're all men) they are absolute cunts.Most people in Finance think they can tell everyone else how to do their jobs better. It’s peculiar. It’s the fundamental principle of Private Equity culture, it’s literally how their operations work. Just because some wanker has become a chartered accountant he (almost always ‘he’) has been told he can restructure a school / charity / transport network /insert anything else here. Weird. I don’t think people who have been trained in things just as complicated (I don’t know, like plumbing or acupuncture) are told to go forth into the world and start running completely different businesses they have only a loose idea about.
Much the same here. Found O level maths really easy, started A level and had a different teacher who was the maths world equivalent of Lage so did a Coady! Did some maths in first year of my biology degree and never used it.I didn't do Maths at A level. Went on to do a Biology degree. Because I didn't have a Maths A level, I had to do a unit of further Maths. Which I didn't use once in passing my degree...
Yeah, I was pretty good at GCSE maths, but seeing the work my brother had to do for A Level Maths a couple of years ago made me very pleased I chose not to do that!Much the same here. Found O level maths really easy, started A level and had a different teacher who was the maths world equivalent of Lage so did a Coady! Did some maths in first year of my biology degree and never used it.
Totally agree. I was also shit at Maths in school and still am, but in this day and age we have so many tools to calculate numbers for us that we dont need to know the actual mechanics of maths, we just need to be comfortable with the concepts.There's a difference between maths and numeracy. As long as people are numerate I see little point in the rest unless it's an area of expertise.
Disagree with the bit in bold. It's dangerous to simply be trusting of the machines to calculate everything, and having the ability to do the mental arithmetic can enable you to pick up bugs in programmes etc which may spout incorrect calculations.Totally agree. I was also shit at Maths in school and still am, but in this day and age we have so many tools to calculate numbers for us that we dont need to know the actual mechanics of maths, we just need to be comfortable with the concepts.
I work with numbers on a weekly basis and mainly use Excel formulas to calculate percentages, or Google it if I get stuck. This is the stuff that kids should be learning - how to work with spreadsheets, how to insert formulas and formatting etc. Makes you work more efficiently and saves time in the long run.