Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,219
- Reaction score
- 8,419
That is going to be mighty close to breaking the broadcasting code if he deviates even slightly from answering the questions
I would be laughing if they weren’t even the official opposition but that feels like a leap.
Starmer, "Hold my beer"...
It does and that is mainly because our political system has tended towards two main parties. The role of the official opposition isI think it automatically goes to the second biggest party. Mind you constitutional law was 35 years ago and I slept through a lot of the lectures
It does and that is mainly because our political system has tended towards two main parties. The role of the official opposition is
to oppose, to criticise and to replace. Theoretically, a coalition of parties could form the official opposition but there would likely need to be an intent for that coalition to be a government in waiting if necessary.
Not a defence of him, more a criticism, I don't believe he's the nasty, vicious bigoted wanker he and his team have decided is the stance he's going to take into the election. It's not authentic in the way I think it is with Badenoch or Braverman. When you get more natural moments he'll refer to Brianna as she because it's the empathetic, human thing to do. When it's scripted he's playing that role he/they have built for him. The language on asylum seekers the same. It's a problem for him when people in his culture wars become real rather than just abstract.It's annoying me that nobody is pointing out the hypocrisy in Sunak's comments. He's referenced Brianna as she/her on more than one occasion (as is right) but nobody seems to be pointing out that he can't have it both ways. Presumably it's the same in the likes of the Mail and Express; they're constantly saying that trans women aren't women, stoking the culture war, but will no doubt be using she/her when talking about Brianna.