Now? It's always been a worthless comic right from its early days. It like a right wing Daily Sport.The Express has totally veered into self parody now. Sadly some fools still lap it up.
The best time to have stopped it would have been before a digger had broken ground. The sooner the better to stop more more being wasted.To the surprise of nobody it looks like they are going to bin the 2nd stage of HS2. That's a lot of disruption, queuing and significantly elongating journeys on the A38 around Lichfield for a lot of people for zero positive benefit. Not to mention those affected by what would now be pointless cpos
Funny how it only became about calamity when the speed argument was undermined by simply pointing out that if you were desperate to be in a London 15 minutes quicker catch an earlier train. Working from home has massively changed how people commute so the capacity prediction pre Covid is no longer valid.It’s not a waste. Infrastructure is required for the country to grow. The rail network is desperate for additional capacity and hs2 is what will do that. It’ll be the biggest mistake in history to bin it off now.
It will also be on open goal for the Labour Party to take back the north of England as the Conservatives will be labelled as having abandoned it.
Taking faster trains off the current infrastructure allows for faster local services and getting more freight onto rail. In turn this will make rail travel more appealing and it will also be greener for the environment too.Funny how it only became about calamity when the speed argument was undermined by simply pointing out that if you were desperate to be in a London 15 minutes quicker catch an earlier train. Working from home has massively changed how people commute so the capacity prediction pre Covid is no longer valid.
HS2 won’t really help that. If you’re travelling from north of Stafford you avoid it by going on the Trent Valley route. Obviously more capacity helps but at what cost? They could use the existing network more effectively - a friend recently had to go down to London a day early as the earliest train wouldn’t get him there in time.Wolverhampton - Birmingham is a known issue as there are only two tracks. So trains from Manchester/Liverpool/Scotland can’t go any faster than the local train/train in front. And then in rush hour that section of the line is chaos capacity wise. Diverting trains around that removes that chaos whilst also creating the added benefit of allowing people to get places faster.
A friend who works on the project was explaining it to me and it all made sense as I was just saying “haha billions of £s and a 20 year project just to get to London 15 minutes faster”.HS2 won’t really help that. If you’re travelling from north of Stafford you avoid it by going on the Trent Valley route. Obviously more capacity helps but at what cost? They could use the existing network more effectively - a friend recently had to go down to London a day early as the earliest train wouldn’t get him there in time.
HS2 won’t really h lo getting to the SW. By time transfer from HS2 to existing network you’ll be slower than the journey from Wolverhampton to Brum.A friend who works on the project was explaining it to me and it all made sense as I was just saying “haha billions of £s and a 20 year project just to get to London 15 minutes faster”.
And all you are considering there is people wanting to get from the North to London. What about people who want to go to the SW?
Will it? From Stafford I’ll be quicker on existing line than changing at Birmingham onto the HS2. Existing line also takes name much more centrally in London.I don’t think that you understand that people don’t necessarily want to go to London on the new line. The new line will quicken up local journey times on the existing network.