To bring it back onto the debate of a new stadium a little bit - I'm curious if many of its supporters have been to games at these identikit new grounds. I've been to quite a few of them: Stoke, Reading, Huddersfield, Wigan, Swansea, Scunthorpe, Cardiff, Derby, Leicester, Coventry... they're crap. Got no personality to them and quite soulless. On a more important note they have fuck all around them for fans. These new grounds end up on retail parks with more places to buy windows and bathrooms than have a drink or sometimes even eat before the match, it's crap. Some of those grounds are also very challenging to get to, Reading's sticks out for that.
I don't see a big shiny new stadium as some guarantee of success either. I don't think it has been mentioned yet but if you look at West Ham and Arsenal, a lot of their fans are not satisfied with their stadiums. They're angry, a lot of them are questioning why they moved as this apparent means of obtaining success has been anything but. It killed the atmosphere at West Ham and (from what I'm told) Arsenal as well. I don't see it as some tradition vs. success debate as we are sacrificing the former (and perhaps more importantly, convenience and accessibility) to try and chase the latter, not ensure it.
If we start doing poorly I don't see how a big new ground that is hard to get to and has nothing around it, helps our attendance. Our fanbase isn't that big so there is not a need for anything drastically bigger.