PuntsWolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,893
- Reaction score
- 7,694
Well then we’re fucked either way!It doesn't have to be a negative formation obviously, we've seen first hand how exciting a team playing a back 5 and a low block can be, but it would be under O'Neil. He's already put the shackles on our front 4 under the guise of being more 'balanced', any shift to a back 3 now would be purely to have an extra defender and limit the amount of space we have to defend as individuals, how that formation worked in an attacking sense would be an afterthought.