Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,204
- Reaction score
- 8,410
Actually it was scaremongering. And I correctly called it out as such.
No it wasn't Frank. And you were incorrect.
Actually it was scaremongering. And I correctly called it out as such.
No it wasn't Frank. And you were incorrect.
The next bit talks about what you posted subsequently, with an analogy:As has been made clear to you more than once, your posting infers racist attitudes. TSB was very clear, that you posted an "I'm not racist but..." post, and you never responded to that.
I then express how I find it sad that you have not moved to condemn racism, given the numerous opportunities you have had to do so. The climax is how this then could be perceived by others:You then proceed to make a series of posts that do not in any way denounce racism or prejudice, and indeed suggest that people should not do anything about racist behaviour and attitudes, as there are laws against these. A nonsense argument. Would I not go to the aid of a person injured in the street, as there is an ambulance service?
I then very facetiously made a silly prediction:Your words are at best utter nonsense. More likely, they are disingenuous. You have tried very hard to sit on the fence and not criticise racists, almost in a "somebody else's problem" kinda way. You had numerous opportunities to say "hey folks, I think racism is wrong too!" but failed to take advantage of any of those opportunities. And it is facts like this which cause others to infer from your posting style that you hold racist beliefs or similar.
At no point did I refer to you, except in the prediction. I referred continuously throughout the post to how you may be perceived. Indeed I referred throughout to others, not to you. I referred only to the views you express. If you are offended by others perceptions of your views, perhaps you should examine what those views are, what they say, and what they mean.Of course, you will no doubt post that you didn't make any racist comment. That doesn't matter, as your words, and lack of certain words highlight an inner belief you aren't comfortable with expressing.
And you will likely post a "boo-hoo the cabal have it in for me", but again that isn't true, as posters clearly have been taking issue with what you say not who you are.
I did not at any point call you racist. Paddy, TSB & Kenny have clearly and repeatedly confirmed this. Read the post again below, with the boldened italic highlighted sections in particular. Part one is clearly about your style of posting:
The next bit talks about what you posted subsequently, with an analogy:
I then express how I find it sad that you have not moved to condemn racism, given the numerous opportunities you have had to do so. The climax is how this then could be perceived by others:
I then very facetiously made a silly prediction:
At no point did I refer to you, except in the prediction. I referred continuously throughout the post to how you may be perceived. Indeed I referred throughout to others, not to you. I referred only to the views you express. If you are offended by others perceptions of your views, perhaps you should examine what those views are, what they say, and what they mean.
You read it and took from it something completely different, that isn't contained within the actual words, structure and meanings. That can only have come from you.
I am sorry to other members who have had to tolerate this misunderstanding. I hope this makes it very clear what my meaning was. I apologise to members and readers who have had to/chosen to trawl through this.
THM, as the above shows (I believe) I have nothing to apologise to you for, as I never, ever called you a racist.
You should however withdraw the insult you mistakenly threw back.
I did not at any point call you racist. Paddy, TSB & Kenny have clearly and repeatedly confirmed this. Read the post again below, with the boldened italic highlighted sections in particular. Part one is clearly about your style of posting:
The next bit talks about what you posted subsequently, with an analogy:
I then express how I find it sad that you have not moved to condemn racism, given the numerous opportunities you have had to do so. The climax is how this then could be perceived by others:
I then very facetiously made a silly prediction:
At no point did I refer to you, except in the prediction. I referred continuously throughout the post to how you may be perceived. Indeed I referred throughout to others, not to you. I referred only to the views you express. If you are offended by others perceptions of your views, perhaps you should examine what those views are, what they say, and what they mean.
You read it and took from it something completely different, that isn't contained within the actual words, structure and meanings. That can only have come from you.
I am sorry to other members who have had to tolerate this misunderstanding. I hope this makes it very clear what my meaning was. I apologise to members and readers who have had to/chosen to trawl through this.
THM, as the above shows (I believe) I have nothing to apologise to you for, as I never, ever called you a racist.
You should however withdraw the insult you mistakenly threw back.
It's not Nuttall's fault btw:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...onal-friend-a7582961.html?cmpid=facebook-post
It's not Nuttall's fault btw:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...onal-friend-a7582961.html?cmpid=facebook-post
He can clarify his outlook by writing “I object strongly to the charge that my views are in any way racist, as I was a black man for six years while I was a Spitfire pilot in the Second World War, including three months as a Rastafarian until my dreadlocks got caught in the propellers.