Premier Quality
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
- Messages
- 9,283
- Reaction score
- 568
I'm presumably the other one then, assuming you're talking guardian. I read it online rather than pay for it though, obviously...
I'm presumably the other one then, assuming you're talking guardian. I read it online rather than pay for it though, obviously...
These Tube strikes must've been caused by some sort of homosexual activity. Any UKIP take on them yet?
Better for the people , who lived there.Safer , more morals and a more caring society. I'm not saying I'm right.It's my perception. I find England a more dangerous place. Beating old people , was almost not heard of. People brag about hitting their partners now. More people carry knives , ect.
Of course UKIP isn't the answer .But I think the other 3 parties , have a lot to answer for.I believe UKIP is a consequence of the failures of the other elected parties.
The scale of elder abuse and of vulnerable adults "in the good old days" is hardy evidence that it was a more caring society. There is plenty of evidence that demonstrates the scale of institutionalised, frequent and cruel abuse and neglect of vulnerable people - a situation that, thankfully, is much better now. Just because you didn't hear about it doesn't mean it wasn't happening.
I don't know anyone personally who has bragged about hitting their partners, maybe you are hanging out with the wrong people. In 43 years I have only seen 1 person draw a knife in a situation I was present at. Most people in this country are victims of mindless attacks in the street but they do happen just like they happened 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago and more.
UKIP is not a consequence, it is an opportunity. An opportunity for people with extreme views to cling onto a veil of respectability.
Not really. Exampke:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...tle-against-inner-city-gun-crime-8463957.html
Don't confuse 'hysterically reported' with 'common'
Don't confuse selective linking , with facts.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-month-shocking-new-figures-show-8681511.html
I tried to put a smiley face but it didn't work.
The town I stay in , when I'm in the UK had 4 murders last year. The most it had ever had before was 1.Like I said it's perception.Maybe the nice towns down south are suffering in the economic climate.
1950s - Teddy Boys and their flick knives and switchblades
1960s - Mods and Rockers and their street battles
1970s and 80s - firms of football hooligans often went with weapons.
And that's just in recent memory but any generation before that and knives would have been a weapon of choice for some of those with violent intent.
You are portraying your perception as fact and admitting that you are doing so. Is it any more common now than then? Or is it more reported now than then? How do you define common? I live in a standard English town, much like many other towns up and down the country. The Isle of Man also has knife crime which again suggests your perception is skewed.
Better for the people , who lived there.Safer , more morals and a more caring society. I'm not saying I'm right.It's my perception. I find England a more dangerous place. Beating old people , was almost not heard of. People brag about hitting their partners now. More people carry knives , ect.