Could just be like a release clause - If Liverpool come in with an offer of X then we will allow you to leave. The club could have inserted a further clause stating that they have the right to break the agreement for a sum of Y to be paid to the player?Sounds bizarre how you can have a third party in a contract for a transfer. An unwritten agreement I could go a long with but an actual written agreement?
They wanted him last year but the odd way they operate at times meant a deadline was put on when they have what seemed to be the exclusive rights to sign him. Presume when they missed that deadline they did a deal with Jorge, which we were happy to facilitate because its Jorge.Well that’s my point. And I’m more getting at the “how” than whether it actually happened. Have Liverpool paid to be in it (how would that even happen), and if they haven’t then it makes no sense. Particularly when it’s clear they didn’t want him, otherwise they’d have signed him instead of the 3 they did.
Forest fans not happy with his form and Cooper was trying to play it down last weekIt would appear that MGW has been dropped