thought they stated that right from the start?It's been tested as much as any other new drug, just over a more intense period.
The new news for me is it isn't effective until 4 weeks after the second dose, so even for tbose who are first up that'll be mid Jan
This. No way will it be a binary "only starting working on the morning 4 weeks after"From what I heard this morning, the first dose will trigger the immune system so there will be an element of immunity from the disease. The second dose then tops it up to its full effectiveness.
Yep, a vaccine doesn't mean we throw all the rules away.We'll absolutely still have to continue with masks, social distancing, avoiding indoor spaces, etc, until the second dose, and maybe even beyond depending on how much immunity reduces your chances of transmitting it.
These figures for efficacy, 94% or whatever, don't mean "94% of people take it and are immune", they mean "94% of people who we tested it on, during a period where they were following pandemic health guidelines, are now immune". Key thing now is making sure that people don't go straight back to the old normal as soon as they get the first shot, because there's every chance that efficacy rate could be much lower in less controlled circumstances.
I noticed that "by the spring" has been quietly changed to "over the spring and summer" in the new info about which demographics get it in which order. Having the finish line in sight is one thing, but I wonder how much patience a lot of people - and, above all, the government - will have when it comes to not jumping the gun too early and causing more unnecessary spikes.
Dunno if this helpsI do have some slight reservations about the vaccine, granted it's been tested and approved but it's still a very short time span from inception to active use, who's to say there won't be long term negative effects that start to shown further down the line?
I mean exactly the same thing can be said of covid-19, whilst in a group that is seen as very low risk there's still some doubt out there that there aren't long term effects of having/overcoming the disease that we don't yet fully understand. I guess you're hedging your bets either way to some extent at the moment.
custom made user title number 2 right there...100% no minge being teased this time
Agree with all of that.We'll absolutely still have to continue with masks, social distancing, avoiding indoor spaces, etc, until the second dose, and maybe even beyond depending on how much immunity reduces your chances of transmitting it.
These figures for efficacy, 94% or whatever, don't mean "94% of people take it and are immune", they mean "94% of people who we tested it on, during a period where they were following pandemic health guidelines, are now immune". Key thing now is making sure that people don't go straight back to the old normal as soon as they get the first shot, because there's every chance that efficacy rate could be much lower in less controlled circumstances.
I noticed that "by the spring" has been quietly changed to "over the spring and summer" in the new info about which demographics get it in which order. Having the finish line in sight is one thing, but I wonder how much patience a lot of people - and, above all, the government - will have when it comes to not jumping the gun too early and causing more unnecessary spikes.
Agree with all of that.
I think it will be another 9-12 months before full 'normality' returns.
My work have emailed us this week to tell us that we are all entitled to a €250 allowance to upgrade our working from home environment, so it would appear that a return to the office is highly unlikely anytime soon.
It is making my College look seriously at its need for office space as Finance, admin and other functions have been very well performed electronically from home by the post holders since April. Why they need office space now is a very limited reason. Additionally sickness is lower than ever . Its a win win. Those who were completely opposed to working from home have had to eat some humble pie as it has been very successful in the main.I don't think the two things are related. I think more folks will work from home as productivity is better with a mix of home and office.
The fact the pandemic caused this has made people evaluate it, if you were a company why would you change it?
It's a greener solution for all as commuting is needed less and people are happier when they aren't sat on a road/ train for 2 hours everyday being miserable.
Aye thats what we are doing - fundamental permanent change to default home working. I feel like a right trailblazer.I don't think the two things are related. I think more folks will work from home as productivity is better with a mix of home and office.
The fact the pandemic caused this has made people evaluate it, if you were a company why would you change it?
It's a greener solution for all as commuting is needed less and people are happier when they aren't sat on a road/ train for 2 hours everyday being miserable.
Agree with all of that.
I think it will be another 9-12 months before full 'normality' returns.
My work have emailed us this week to tell us that we are all entitled to a €250 allowance to upgrade our working from home environment, so it would appear that a return to the office is highly unlikely anytime soon.
If you listen to my boss all those that work from home are lazy bastards who can’t be trusted not to fuck around all day. Just hearing the words ‘working from home’ sets him off on a rant!I don't think the two things are related. I think more folks will work from home as productivity is better with a mix of home and office.
The fact the pandemic caused this has made people evaluate it, if you were a company why would you change it?
It's a greener solution for all as commuting is needed less and people are happier when they aren't sat on a road/ train for 2 hours everyday being miserable.