Include Palace and Newcastle and it is fine though.
I wouldn’t say 21 points from 15 games against fodder was “fine”, but still. You think it is so the argument between yourself and cyber/whoever will never come to an agreement as your goalposts are in different places.
Where people put arbitrary cut offs in the table to form their arguments is the issue. And hey, each decision to do that in the table has its merits. My whole table breakdown shows we have picked up points from everywhere in the table.
As above, we have clearly underperformed (points wise) against the lower half of the table, this is a fact not an opinion. It doesn’t matter whether your cut off is bottom 3,5,7,8, we’ve still underperformed. Everyone else is our mini league or Sky 6. The real cut off is the bottom 3. 4 points from 5 games against 3 of the worst teams ever at this level, that just isn’t good enough and if we want to enter the sky 6 then that needs to be a 14 point return minimum.
I do agree though that if we could have picked up the STUPID points we lost against some of the poorest sides we would be making the Chelsea hairy starfish quiver and shake, but that is probably for next season and beyond. THAT is our passport to the top table. I am confident we will get there. Well you’ve responded to my point here. To progress we need to be putting these teams away. Let’s go for the cup, let it be with the league and then kick on next year with a year of experience behind us and less FFP restraints