That was judged as nonsense though. The point is the can design was considered at risk of being appealing to under age children. I am sure it will be a minor change, especially as the judgement cleared the brewery of the charge of not labelling it clearly as alcohol, which is only correct.
The interesting point is about 330ml cans being associated with soft drinks. I sort of get that, but Heineken has been available in 330m cans for years as I remember (in their old style six packs). Ah well, the Portman Group do have to be co-operated with to an extent...but this was a little bit of overkill for me.