Wolves v Arsenal [Tue 6pm BT Sport 1]

[Parkins left foot]

As said if we can't work out the formation then Arteta won't either

Problem for us is if our players can't as well.

Predicted a draw which is what I think we will get

 

[Nando]

As said if we can't work out the formation then Arteta won't either

Problem for us is if our players can't as well.

Predicted a draw which is what I think we will get

Dean says hello.

 

[StuardoWulf]

Wolves 3-0 40-1 yay
I've had 2-0 as well in case

 

[Tony Towner]

I don’t mind that, I might be in the minority on here though

I think there's flaws however you play it. Adama at RWB doesn't work, but the alternative is Kilman LB where you are exposing his lack of pace and Coady in a 2. Assuming it is him at RWB we need Moutinho and Neves to do what they used to be good at, shutting down passing angles and space off the ball and not too bloody deep

 

[The Bear]

I really hope it's 4-2-3-1.

Surely the way we played against them last time with that formation will influence Nuno's thinking?

 

[sycophantia]

If its that formation I'm not keen, also not keen on Neves and Moutinho.
If its 4 at the back, thats fine

 

[YoungWolf]

I hope it’s the 4231 personally BUT if it is Adama at wing back at least we have more attacking, forward thinking players on the pitch together

 

[PuntsWolf]

I think there's flaws however you play it. Adama at RWB doesn't work, but the alternative is Kilman LB where you are exposing his lack of pace and Coady in a 2. Assuming it is him at RWB we need Moutinho and Neves to do what they used to be good at, shutting down passing angles and space off the ball and not too bloody deep

Kilman being in a back 4 is no different to when he’s getting sucked out into the channel when the WBs out of position. If anything the back 4 gives him more protection. (As I keep saying 4-2-3-1 isn’t an attacking formation anymore than 3-4-3 is a defensive one).
Marcal wasn’t rapid either. You don’t need pace if you use your body well and stand in the right position.

I’d be amazed if it’s a back 5. And if it is would be more evidence to me that he doesn’t know what he’s doing.

 

[Tony Towner]

I’d be amazed if it’s a back 5. And if it is would be more evidence to me that he doesn’t know what he’s doing.

Would you? Adama came on at RWB on Saturday. I'd be surprised if it's not a 5

 

[sycophantia]

Hoping its one of Nuno's tactical masterstrokes

 

[The Bear]

If they really have all sat down, players and staff, to discuss what is going wrong then surely a positive attitude has come out of that meeting?

Which means they HAVE to show that on the pitch from the off.

If it's the same old tired tactics with disjointed and isolated attackers, then it's time to start getting worried.

 

[redvictor]

I really hope it's 4-2-3-1.

Surely the way we played against them last time with that formation will influence Nuno's thinking?

Pretty sure it is 4-2-3-1.

 

[YoungWolf]

Would you? Adama came on at RWB on Saturday. I'd be surprised if it's not a 5

Yeah, feels like a case of protecting Hoever who has struggled a bit.

 

[StuardoWulf]

Oh f'in hell I've to listen to Hoddle Twaddle now

 

[PuntsWolf]

Would you? Adama came on at RWB on Saturday. I'd be surprised if it's not a 5

Yeah and it was a shambles. So if he keeps making the same mistakes then my faith will keep wearing thin.

 

[Nando]

Apparently Nuno has said Kilman is at left back.

 

[SSB]

Has been Raul been seen grappling with Luiz in a headlock behind the scenes?

 

[StuardoWulf]

Has been Raul been seen grappling with Luiz in a headlock behind the scenes?

Somebody should f'kin lamp him little bast...

 

[prawnking]

Apparently Nuno has said Kilman is at left back.

Good challenge for Max v Saka

 

[YoungWolf]

Boly left is better too