Caution at all times. Shape, shape, shape. We hardly ever try a threaded pass as the opposition could intercept and break with players slightly out of position. It’s attritional and just about tolerable when it works but Lage could rapidly lose all the credit he has built up if we play the same way in the two games this week and lose.So why are two successive managers ending up making the same mistake?
It's baffling.So why are two successive managers ending up making the same mistake?
Portuguese style and coaching ethos?So why are two successive managers ending up making the same mistake?
Could be that Bruno just isn't up to it.It's baffling.
Can't be a coincidence both have played the exact same way.
There's something deeper at play.
Kilman was exposed against Leicester when Semedo played. It's not how we play, it's how the opposition play against us which has changed in that respect. Hit us quick on the transition with the wing back high up the pitch ams isolate the centre half. Their first goal came from that on SaturdaySpecifically the way we plug gaps for each other out of possession has regressed significantly, IMO. How much of that isn’t helped by Semedo’s absence is hard to say, but it’s definitely left Kilman exposed.
Unfortunately I have to agree, at the start I was happy to give the guy a chance (still am till the end of the season) and to be fair there did seem to be some improvements on last season in some games. He's done some weird stuff with subs when we've gone behind (as did Nuno).You do wonder what we're getting from Lage that we wouldn't be getting from Nuno, because it isn't goals or good football, and he either has limited/no say on transfers and it's a non factor, or he was fine with or even a key part of signing Hwang and Trincao (who are both wank), which would be a concern. He's bigged up as a bit of a master with youth but all he's done there is not pick Cundle for ages when he could have then immediately drop him after a good debut, and marginalise Fabio to the point he frequently never even comes on as sub.
Spending £10m+ on sacking our entire backroom staff then a year's money on top for whatever the new lot are costing us, seems steep. Meanwhile we're all paying a lot more to watch football that is a lot worse than we were watching two years ago.
We don't seem better tactically, we aren't any more fun to watch than the lowest of Nuno's reign (which is absolutely not how he should be judged as a whole), a McGhee-esque record whenever we go behind, crap subs, we were shite in the cups and he doesn't have the personality that Nuno had. Now started saying we played well when we could all see that we didn't (then claiming less than a week later that he was really angry) and digging out players in public.
The jury is very much out, I'm not sure he survives the summer if we go at under 1 PPG (and/or 1 GPG) from here for the rest of the season.
You do wonder what we're getting from Lage that we wouldn't be getting from Nuno
Yeah I think this is also fair as much as I wanted him to be given the chance to prove that otherwise. And we've seen that from his rather brief reign at Spurs, which was painful to watch.You'd have thought that it was a case of Nuno's head being gone or the players not responding to him and his methods after a while, coupled with the club wanting a more progressive playing style.
But, as you say, the latter hasn't materialised, and it doesn't currently look like they're running through brick walls for Bruno and his fresh ideas either?
Could be that Bruno just isn't up to it.
He's got time to prove me wrong but even at my least optimistic I would have expected some semblance of improvement at this stage, not unlike what we've seen from Arsenal.
Instead, we've drastically regressed since Saiss went to AFCON.