machin05
MURDERS BADGERS. PTG Dogsbody and Spreadsheet Mast
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,846
- Reaction score
- 882
Yes, let's force cyclists to use cycle lanes that aren't fit for purpose - full of potholes, poorly paved and shared with buses. That's right, in Cambridge where everyone cycles. Not everyone is an idiot riding through red lights or trying to set Strava records in the rush hour.Exactly. Just what I said and my biggest concern.
But then guardian readers do as they like most of the times " freedom of choice" and all that . Bikes already do as they like in Cambridge. Now they will have protection . I advise everyone to get a dash cam. Its likely to be a difficult transition. I just don't want to see people get hurt.
The missed opportunity to mandate cycle paths is a mistake in my view.
My dash cam footage does not agreeYes, let's force cyclists to use cycle lanes that aren't fit for purpose - full of potholes, poorly paved and shared with buses. That's right, in Cambridge where everyone cycles. Not everyone is an idiot riding through red lights or trying to set Strava records in the rush hour.
How big is your bike that it has a dashboard???My dash cam footage does not agree
And I cycle there most days too
Drive to work then cycle during the day then drive home. Not that youre really interested.How big is your bike that it has a dashboard???
That I agree withAnother issue with cycle paths at this time of the year is they are rarely (if ever) gritted so are a death trap in these conditions.
Cycle lanes are what car drivers think cycle lanes should look like.Those painted bits of road are categorically more dangerous than just having cyclists in the main carriageway. Drivers tend to drive to the line regardless of how much space they are giving the cyclist. Plus there are often drain covers (and the cracked tarmac that surrounds them) taking up at least half of the width of the said painted lane that pose real danger to cyclists, forcing them to use the outer portion of the space, bringing them way too close to any motorist driving to the line.
That bike lane has always been there though right? It's so that cyclists can get out of the Grand Arcade cycle park (pretty much where the photo is taken from) and out on to Downing Street. Good route, used to take it quite a bit. Almost all onciming traffic is turning right into the (massive) multi-storey car park - from which, as an side, you can exit on your motor by turning right from the exit furthest left and left from the exit furthest right (or people do at any rate). Everything goes nice and slow on that street so it all seems to work OK? As you've all identified, and it's a good debate, Cambridge is such an outlier though. Modal share for cycling looks nothing like anywhere else in the UK, at all.Corn exchange street against the traffic- typical in the centre. Again new
I guess with so many students and a requiremen t to cycle , Cambridge has invested VERY heavily in cycle ways to reduce car traffic and make the streets safer. The problem is Cyclist dont use what is provided most of the time. Unlike Machins reasons above , which are very valid , the cycle ways in Cambridge are often very very good, very well maintained and very underused.
View attachment 4970