• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Summer 2024 Transfer Thread.

GLASGOWOLF said:
And as said above, €20 million does not get a better experienced premier League defender than Max.
None of the centre halfs that moved for that money, were better than Killman, O'Shea most certainly is a big downgrade.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, the first line is complete crap
 
He also expected us to sign a first team CB.
 
GON mate, that's two transfer windows now. You know who these people are by now.
 
What was is the club said about being more free this summer?

1725178459513.png
 
That Manchester City have no ambition do they? Won’t win anything with that kind of transfer policy
 
Tredman said:
What was is the club said about being more free this summer?

View attachment 11496
Click to expand...
Got to have some put aside to cover the zero spend in January and the Larsen and Forbs fees next summer (they will count them twice, right now and again when the window opens and we announce them as new signings)
 
Thought we had a decent window and don't understand the negativity.

We are a buy low sell high club. The board have stated multiple times we need to be self sufficient.

So on fees we are in profit. Does anyone factor in other things like wages for a bigger squad? More ins than outs is more agent fees etc?
 
Blakenhall Wolf said:
Thought we had a decent window and don't understand the negativity.

We are a buy low sell high club. The board have stated multiple times we need to be self sufficient.

So on fees we are in profit. Does anyone factor in other things like wages for a bigger squad? More ins than outs is more agent fees etc?
Click to expand...
No, nobody has put any thought into their opinion on this and definitely there aren’t pages of evidence of it
 
Blakenhall Wolf said:
Thought we had a decent window and don't understand the negativity.

We are a buy low sell high club. The board have stated multiple times we need to be self sufficient.

So on fees we are in profit. Does anyone factor in other things like wages for a bigger squad? More ins than outs is more agent fees etc?
Click to expand...

I think all most people want is a coherent transfer strategy.

That means stop;

- Signing children for £35m
- Having a taps on taps off approach
- Ignoring massive gaps in the squad LB this season, CF in the past
- Stop signing players who patently don't want to be here
- Not backloading a transfer fee owed
- Have succession planning in place. If we're buy low sell high we should be all in on that and shouldn't have the gaps above if we know the first XI are here for a good time not a long time
- Don't lie to supporters who have eyes and can clearly see otherwise
 
There's been some conflicting information on the Saudi deadline - while the closing date for the whole country isn't until October, for the top flight it's tomorrow. So if Sa is going there then it needs doing quickly.

The other option is Turkey which doesn't close until September 18 and they always love a Premier League reject.
 
Blakenhall Wolf said:
Thought we had a decent window and don't understand the negativity.

We are a buy low sell high club. The board have stated multiple times we need to be self sufficient.

So on fees we are in profit. Does anyone factor in other things like wages for a bigger squad? More ins than outs is more agent fees etc?
Click to expand...
Do you factor in other revenue?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Bear
  • Locked
The Summer 2018 Transfer Thread
340 341 342
Replies
7K
Views
600K
The Bear
The Bear
Back
Top