Stan Hullis
Talked the talk and walked the walk.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 16,434
- Reaction score
- 1,905
Wouldn't surprise me if we gave him a new deal when sending him out on loan. "Protect the value"
While throwing away Vitinha and Pedro Gonçalves.Wouldn't surprise me if we gave him a new deal when sending him out on loan. "Protect the value"
Looked alright at Stoke didn't he?Yep, we paid £9m for him.
We got £5m for Ryan Giles who has actually looked good at Championship level, unlike Hoever who looks a complete defensive liability with far less attacking output.
In another multiverse somewhere, we're sitting here with Vitinha, Gonçalves and Olmo as our attacking midfield options.While throwing away Vitinha and Pedro Gonçalves.
Jeff you genius, you've done it again.
Gomes and Fernandes behind them, Cunha up topIn another multiverse somewhere, we're sitting here with Vitinha, Gonçalves and Olmo as our attacking midfield options.
I actually don't think Racist Enzo is particularly good. I mean I wouldn't necessarily put him in our best XI and he cost £100m.Gomes and Fernandes behind them, Cunha up top
Probably, but our best players don't usually get taken away really quickly.All three of them would have been long gone by now.
I actually don't think Racist Enzo is particularly good. I mean I wouldn't necessarily put him in our best XI and he cost £100m.
(Of course it would have been a good deal for us to sign him and flip him like Benfica did)
Burnley fans rate him but then they said similar of the last centre back we signed from them..
They’ve only just made his loan in to a permanent move & also denied him going to the Olympics in his home country of France, so I can’t imagine they’d be willing to let him go for a fair sum. That’s not to say we haven’t enquired, though.