Tony Towner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 39,801
- Reaction score
- 26,773
Obviously wins are hypothetical and difficult to answer as the whole playing style would have to be different. They were 2-2 before going to the run heavy approach after the bye, only lost 1 since with a backup QB, so moving to him as the centerpiece of the offense did see a significant uplift.I think you're wrong, but it's opinions.
Edit: I'm guessing you believe Saquon was the player most valuable to his team, and that's a good shout. But answer this: take Allen, Saquon and Jackson out of their respective teams and how many wins do those teams get? The Bills win a maximum of 5 games without Josh Allen. I'd bet the Ravens and Eagles could both still win 9-10 games without Jackson and Saquon. The Eagles have the best overall roster in the NFL and the Ravens would still win 8+ games with someone handing the ball off to Derrick Henry 30 times a game.
In the previous 2 years Philly had RBs in Swift and Sanders who both went to the probowl with 1000 yard seasons, he doubled that. I know this is a bit simplistic but he's twice as good statistically as at the time league average running backs. If Josh Allen was replaced by a league average QB, a fit Tua for the sake of argument would he perform at half the level?
What I do agree with which is ultimately why a QB wins it every year is a QB can have a very good season in isolation, on his talent alone. A RB needs at the least a competent OL to do so and that the Eagles have a stronger roster all round than the Bills do and if he was playing tomorrow, Philly would win by 2 scores+
Last edited: