Johnny75
Virtual Cock
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 36,291
- Reaction score
- 12,473
Rugby tackling technique is not safer given the levels of protection the AF players wear. That's empirical fact.In this case it was him making the tackle. I'm hoping this starts a debate on receivers/running backs using their helmets to initiate contact when tackled. Defensive players aren't allowed to but offensive players can.
I've suggested in the past taking facemasks off the helmets to improve safety. If there was a danger of losing your teeth trying to make a tackle you'd probably think more about form tackling. You make a good point about rugby parallels mind. rugby tackling technique is not only safer it's more effective.
In fact it's the most unsafe of all the collision sports, also having the highest concussion rate.
There is an ongoing discussion on trying to bring the tackle height down to below the nipple line for safety reasons in both codes to bring this rate down.
Facegaurds are an important feature of head protection as they absorb force in an impact and there's a fair amount of work done in this area to make the helmets 'shift' under impact to mitigate impact force and subsequently risk of TBI.
It is always safer to wear a helmet for anything. That should never be in doubt.
I agree there's an important discussion to be had with leading with the helmet on the offensive side. It's certainly safer for the attacking player to lower the helmet and almost certainly not for the defender.