We should also take a moment to consider the history of Women's football too. I agree it's not comparable to men's football, and actually just like Rugby and Cricket, it's not something I choose to watch unless it's a major competition. And therefore I don't compare the two. But I wouldn't want any children growing up to be put off any sport by comparing it to the Male equivalent.
However it was Danny Batth's partner who opened my eyes to how men repressed women's football almost 100 years ago when it was more popular than the men's game, thus that hardly helped the chances of growth in the game.
How many of you knew that on Boxing Day 1920, Goodison Park pulled in 53,000 fans to watch Dick Kerr's Ladies play St Helen's Ladies?
And that on 5 December 1921, the FA effectively banned women from playing saying "the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and ought not to be encouraged". A ban that lasted 50 years? (
www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/47625739)
For me, men of those times have a lot to answer for. Who is to say without that ban, it might not have been women's football which was the bigger sport, or certainly much closer in terms of audience (and no doubt closer in quality as more women would be playing it)?
I've also been disappointed with Wolves not taking the women's team seriously and giving them zero infrastructure, although that now appears to be changing. Unless I've missed it, it could be good to have a thread set up on here purely for them. It might bring new posters on to here and diversify some of the other threads too..