I think that's really reductive and doesn't consider the reality of the situation. The unhappiness of fans is shared by the manager, and it cost us the last fella. "Never enough" in this context is 1 development squad playerIt’s an historical fan thing with every Clubs fans, there’s never enough new signings.
The manager wanted a 9.It’s an historical fan thing with every Clubs fans, there’s never enough new signings.
Our big splashes (in terms of spend) have largely sucked.Whether FFP is an issue or not they will always throw that line out there as an excuse anyway. I wouldn't expect a big splash in the market, we will most likely sell Neto and spend some but not all of that.
Our big splashes (in terms of spend) have largely sucked.
Not what I said, is it.Best stop trying then
Not what I said, is it.
That the idea of a big splash is often better than the reality.I don't know what you're saying?
That the idea of a big splash is often better than the reality.
We don’t need splashy signings, we need good ones.
Accounting is to 31st May, FFP/PSR to the end of June. The Neves sale can't be booked into the 31.05.23 figures but can be noted as a post balance sheet event.The interesting part of the accounts will be which year did we book Neves in, because if we lost £60m odd with a £50m straight profit drop in there, something very strange has gone on. If we didn't and it's in for this season we've got shit loads of headroom even by the current rules.
It's not been about FFP/PSR since that sale anyway, with cashflow / liquidity being the problem those won't really be relevant to what we do our don't spend
I’m not convinced that clubs our size have many other options.You need to invest heavily in players at this level, you can 100% find bargains but over a bigger sample size, if you keep operating a policy of selling your best players and replacing them with "bargains" you get relegated.