• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The January 2024 "Will we actually sign a striker or just Che Adams/Kieffer Moore" Transfer Thread

I like that terminology in that quote. Let’s hope against hope the type we were after were ‘expensive but sht again’ and now we are restricted to ‘cheap but pretty good actually’. More seriously is he trying to avoid saying ‘proven / experienced’ but now it just has to be ‘young, cheaper and a punt’?
 
He isn't right now, never stops crosses and attacking wise he's dining off that cross vs Palace well over a year ago.

Still empires better than Matt Doherty.
Tbf, it was a very good cross. *starts staring off into distance*

I'd love to know what's going on with him, can't just be injuries. I hope it's not a case like Sasa where GON has marked a player and that's it.
 
I've never understood this mindset, it's defeatest.

We're more than likely to lose Neto and maybe RAN and if we're really unfortunate Gomes.

That's not only a striker but first choice winger, LB and CM to replace too.

And we will still be fed the line we need to not spend, because with the current owners that's exactly what is going to happen.

Just for parity we got Gomes, Dawson, Cunha and Sarabia in last January.

It's not impossible to get players in of real quality at any time.
Also gives the new signings half a season to acclimatise. Look at the difference in cunha, sarabia, even Gomes to an extent. Aware there’s other factors (management change, different style etc) but still would’ve been useful.
 
Also wouldn't loading some of the spending into this year's P&L actually be a good idea as its been a good year, the hit won't be as harsh when this year falls off in 3 years?
 
Also wouldn't loading some of the spending into this year's P&L actually be a good idea as its been a good year, the hit won't be as harsh when this year falls off in 3 years?
Very likely the rules will be very different by then, seems that privately they've conceded they're currently a mix of outdated and counter-intuitive.
 
Also wouldn't loading some of the spending into this year's P&L actually be a good idea as its been a good year, the hit won't be as harsh when this year falls off in 3 years?
This assumes the refusal to spend is *actually* only about FFP / PSR

(and, in any event, the club will argue it's better for FFP / PSR to get cheaper deals in the summer than to overspend now)

EDIT (and, as Deutsch says, the clubs will vote in something different before long, having realised that "the other 14" are all completely hamstrung by the current PSR rules)
 
Last season this time we highlighted the need in certain positions and got the likes of Lemina and Dawson on the cheap and Gomes for a good deal.

All people are asking for is the club to do the same again, cover the positions we will have players sent out on loan (so a CB if Mosquera is leaving, a forward to cover the 2 we've loaned away).

Being fine with squad "as is" to me is a weird take, it's in worse a state than going into January. You'd hope they're paying the fitness and medical staff top dollar.
 
They agreed they'd change for next season, although I'm not sure if the changes themselves have been announced
 
Last season this time we highlighted the need in certain positions and got the likes of Lemina and Dawson on the cheap and Gomes for a good deal.

All people are asking for is the club to do the same again, cover the positions we will have players sent out on loan (so a CB if Mosquera is leaving, a forward to cover the 2 we've loaned away).

Being fine with squad "as is" to me is a weird take, it's in worse a state than going into January. You'd hope they're paying the fitness and medical staff top dollar.
Last season we were staring into the abyss so had to do something.
 
For me, the bottom line is that one more forward almost certainly won't be the difference between staying up and relegation. It's been clear, almost from the moment Julen left, that staying up is the prime directive for the entire club this season.

It's a big "if", but if this dry spell allows us more flexibility in the future, so be it.

Obviously YMMV on the above, and for many it's already a non-starter of a thought. Which is fair.
 
Something else from that Facebook group, saying using comments from that Maguire geezer saying we are in discussions about a Points deduction because the sale of Nunez cannot go into this season's books ...

Laughable
 
giphy.gif
 
Back
Top