Well that's what you said
"No, I wouldn't just assume a player is better than another just because of what league they've played in."
You probably should leave it there, as it's a bloody ridiculous statement.
League not division.
Well that's what you said
"No, I wouldn't just assume a player is better than another just because of what league they've played in."
You probably should leave it there, as it's a bloody ridiculous statement.
I'm curious. If say West Ham or Palace, who finished with similar points totals last season, lost a few key players and replaced them with Bellegarde, Bueno, González & Doyle would anyone on here be looking at them thinking they'd had a successful transfer window?
On the face of it no. If we had decided we have cash, will spend it and signed the same players then we would be very underwhelmed indeed.I'm curious. If say West Ham or Palace, who finished with similar points totals last season, lost a few key players and replaced them with Bellegarde, Bueno, González & Doyle would anyone on here be looking at them thinking they'd had a successful transfer window?
I don't think they would have made themselves demonstrably worse.I'm curious. If say West Ham or Palace, who finished with similar points totals last season, lost a few key players and replaced them with Bellegarde, Bueno, González & Doyle would anyone on here be looking at them thinking they'd had a successful transfer window?
I'm curious. If say West Ham or Palace, who finished with similar points totals last season, lost a few key players and replaced them with Bellegarde, Bueno, González & Doyle would anyone on here be looking at them thinking they'd had a successful transfer window?
West ham is an interesting case. I've no idea why they are being lauded as transfer winners when on the face of it their business looks similar to ours.
Lost their best player. Replaced him with 2 inferior footballers and signed a pretty expensive punt in Kudus.
Not arguing either is successful but perception currently is miles apart.
Straw man.Well that's insane.
So a National League player isn't necessarily better than someone playing in the Premier League?
They have had a cracking start, but I still think they are Pacqueta and Antonio injuries away from being a bottom half team again.They’ve had a cracking start to the season I suppose. I wouldn’t have had him here but in fairness to JWP he has hit the ground running for West Ham.
I'm surprised at the lack of flipping players in the fosun era. I felt certain that being in bed with Mendes, we'd have seen much more of it.I agree that it’s not sustainable to continually lose money. There aren’t many years in the last twenty years that Wolves have made a profit.
Many posters seem to expect Fosun to invest in the club every window.
I’m sure that after buying Wolves, Fosun expected to put money into the club so that the club does well enough to generate the level of income to become self-sufficient. Perhaps they under estimated how much or how long it would take. They certainly wouldn’t have planned for their bigger financial problems. They might be prepared to invest more when their financial position improves.
Wolves seem a long way from being a self-sufficient PL club at the moment. The recent player sales and purchases offer a glimmer of hope in that direction.
Wolves have held on to assets for too long under Fosun. There's a happy medium to be found though and recruitment id key. Wolves need to find that sweet spot.
Certain leagues have more physicality than others so there's more to it than just top level in other leagues. Hardly any Italians make it in England regardless of the prestige of team they play for.Players who operate at the top level in other leagues are far more likely to succeed than young players playing in France or South America, no?
You're also using examples from 15-20 years ago.
These don't, I promise you.Certain leagues have more physicality than others so there's more to it than just top level in other leagues. Hardly any Italians make it in England regardless of the prestige of team they play for.
The French league and South America at least have the physicality to match the EPL, a good player from there has every chance of hitting the ground running unlike alot of the Portugeezers we have purchased
Uruguay for example have exported many, and have always played with a bite to their game, Argentina the same no?These don't, I promise you.
I would clearly have had JWP here..box to box midfielder with set pieces skills..They’ve had a cracking start to the season I suppose. I wouldn’t have had him here but in fairness to JWP he has hit the ground running for West Ham.
No.Uruguay for example have exported many, and have always played with a bite to their game, Argentina the same no?
Not really, we've had a manager change caused by the actions of the club during the window closed yesterday.Our business is best judged over 2023 as a whole. We brought in the known quantities in Jan and have added depth/ potential yesterday.
Nobody in the league had as impactful a window as us in January.
West Ham first XI players out: Rice, Scamacca, VlasicWest ham is an interesting case. I've no idea why they are being lauded as transfer winners when on the face of it their business looks similar to ours.
Lost their best player. Replaced him with 2 inferior footballers and signed a pretty expensive punt in Kudus.
Not arguing either is successful but perception currently is miles apart.