MARKakaJIM
Contrary Mary
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
- Messages
- 24,604
- Reaction score
- 3,445
I suppose there could be a bit of a double edged sword to it.
It seems that the later developers currently end up with better tactical/technical skills as they focus on that as a means to overcome their earlier developing, bigger/stronger rivals but if you're leveling off the playing field physically then the big lads will have to brush up on the technical/tactical side as they can't just bully people out of games anymore but will the smaller lads put so much effort into working on those technical/tactical skills when they're not being bullied out of games all the time? I can see a mix of the two approaches being used to good effect, having the even playing field will encourage growth in certain aspects whilst having the challenge of competing against people who have different physical abilities will grant difference challenges and encourage them to learn other means to overcome those problems.
There was something else mentioned in that thing I was reading yesterday, think it was on the BBC so i'll try and find it.
When they mentioned the high numbers of Q1 lads in academies due to their physical development they also had a similar, yet reversed, pattern higher up in the game, might have been international players I think where there was a significantly higher proportion were Q3 and Q4, so perhaps that early physical disadvantage had provided an challenge where players had pushed themselves to improve elsewhere and become better players overall.
It seems that the later developers currently end up with better tactical/technical skills as they focus on that as a means to overcome their earlier developing, bigger/stronger rivals but if you're leveling off the playing field physically then the big lads will have to brush up on the technical/tactical side as they can't just bully people out of games anymore but will the smaller lads put so much effort into working on those technical/tactical skills when they're not being bullied out of games all the time? I can see a mix of the two approaches being used to good effect, having the even playing field will encourage growth in certain aspects whilst having the challenge of competing against people who have different physical abilities will grant difference challenges and encourage them to learn other means to overcome those problems.
There was something else mentioned in that thing I was reading yesterday, think it was on the BBC so i'll try and find it.
When they mentioned the high numbers of Q1 lads in academies due to their physical development they also had a similar, yet reversed, pattern higher up in the game, might have been international players I think where there was a significantly higher proportion were Q3 and Q4, so perhaps that early physical disadvantage had provided an challenge where players had pushed themselves to improve elsewhere and become better players overall.