• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Cricket Thread

That might be your view, but what Buttler did isn't unusual and isn't poor captaincy

Each to their own I just think it’s over thinking things, an early wicket or reducing them to -10 in the first 2 overs puts them on the back foot.
 
Each to their own I just think it’s over thinking things, an early wicket or reducing them to -10 in the first 2 overs puts them on the back foot.
As I said, when it works it works, when it doesn't it doesn't. Durham opened the bowling with a spinner against Warwickshire this afternoon and he took a wicket with his second legitimate ball and they went on to win
 
I get why we did it, two left handers in and the short side was hitting against the spin. Went terribly though
 
Archer usually has Warner on toast every time he bowls at him so I think it would have been a better option than a part time spinner.
Buttler said in his post match interview it was a gut call, fair enough.
 
Pakistan have been excellent with the ball
 
So Pakistan screwed it up.... they really are a mess.
 
Scotland smashing Oman so easily isn’t good for England

As we said after the Scotland game, as long as we don’t lose heavily to Australia we should be ok, so we went and lost heavily.
All we can hope is that we beat Namibia and Oman heavily and hope Australia aren’t in charity mode when they play Scotland.
 
Scotland NRR+2.164
England NRR -1.8

Two big wins should make that back up as long as Australia beat Scotland reasonably well.
Those first 5 overs Saturday is where it’ll come back and bite us I think.
 
Wouldn’t surprise me if Australia don’t try and win too easily against Scotland to try and knock us out - if they’re chasing 120 just take it easy and do it in 18 overs or something
 
Wouldn’t surprise me if Australia don’t try and win too easily against Scotland to try and knock us out - if they’re chasing 120 just take it easy and do it in 18 overs or something

They tried doing that to NZ in 1999, scored something like 12 off 10 overs chasing a tiny target vs West Indies (didn't work out in the end but they did have a go).

Can only do our own bit from here. For NRR purposes I guess we bat first if we have the choice in both games?
 
They tried doing that to NZ in 1999, scored something like 12 off 10 overs chasing a tiny target vs West Indies (didn't work out in the end but they did have a go).

Can only do our own bit from here. For NRR purposes I guess we bat first if we have the choice in both games?

Yep try and put 200 on the board and reduce the opponent to under 150.

Gives you a +2.5 NRR per game if my maths are right.
 
I’m right in thinking it’s calculated by the average runs scored per over minus the average you concede?
 
We're going at 9.7 an over at the minute so need to keep Oman/Namibia down to low scores?

Batting 165 + 200(?) + 200(?) = 9.42?

90 + 201 +120(?) + 120(?) = 7.59?
 
SA starting terribly again, 23/4 vs Bangladesh
 
Bangladesh somehow choke and only make 109/7
 
Back
Top