sycophantia
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 11,166
- Reaction score
- 5,440
I just use a cheap one but tbf the sound quality isn't that important to me as I'm usually on the hoof with the dog.
Mine aren't tbf they're mostly fucked.Are your ears really that finely tuned that you can tell the difference between entry level and high level equipment - especially while you're cycling?
You've just made that up haven't you?Apple's USB-C to 3.5mm dongle actually measures pretty well, and I think should only run about £10. That could be worth a shot before you dive into something pricier.
DAPs are so niche these days that anything good is also saddled with overkill audiophile snake oil. Definitely don't pay for anything that advertises MQA compatibility. Load of shit.
I fucking wish.You've just made that up haven't you?
whats the sound quality like?I got this off Amazon, cheapo but pretty good. It can play videos, the screen is tiny but didn't stop me watching Harry Potter on it
View attachment 6474
he's not. there are several on the market at over £2000!You've just made that up haven't you?
Fine, I have no other input sorry ha.whats the sound quality like?
Did it a while ago - can just do it in a docker and manage the resources for the imageAnybody here do Folding@home with their PC? Curious what the setup experience is like.
Music to my ears (although not music for my system's RAM!). Cheers, bud.Did it a while ago - can just do it in a docker and manage the resources for the image
Was on Sky. Simply because they were the cheapest by a margin.Are all mobile networks pretty much the same as each other these days?
I only ask as I used to be on EE and found that I had great mobile coverage and speeds pretty much anywhere but they were getting more and more expensive. I switched to Sky Mobile a while ago due to the better value and flexibility but I am finding their signal coverage and speed seems noticeably inferior to EE’s was (I think Sky piggy back onto the O2 network).
I was just wondering if I would be better off if I switched network or if it doesn’t make that much difference?
I know they used to be different. EE was made up of orange and T-Mobile. One was short range and the other long range so they ended up with great coverage.Are all mobile networks pretty much the same as each other these days?
I only ask as I used to be on EE and found that I had great mobile coverage and speeds pretty much anywhere but they were getting more and more expensive. I switched to Sky Mobile a while ago due to the better value and flexibility but I am finding their signal coverage and speed seems noticeably inferior to EE’s was (I think Sky piggy back onto the O2 network).
I was just wondering if I would be better off if I switched network or if it doesn’t make that much difference?
This explains it then. But why?O2 are shit in west midlands, like truly appalling. The rest are ok.
I know they used to be different. EE was made up of orange and T-Mobile. One was short range and the other long range so they ended up with great coverage.
Sky mobile are underpinned by O2, I don't know what they're like coverage wise though.
I'm with talk mobile who use Vodafone which is fine in cities but rubbish out in the sticks, but it's really cheap.
Congestion I think, coverage is good but overloaded.This explains it then. But why?