• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Spoilt Princesses moaning about Media Coverage of Wolves

They describe Sako as "out of sorts" in their back page story today.

artworks-000032605198-ukw543-crop.jpg
 
Last edited:
Just read it, a $#@!ing disgraceful attempt to stir things up, first comment suggests they've $#@!ed up.

That has made fantastic reading and they have misfired totally with that non story..
So we dont give them any traffic revenue...ive copy/pasted some comments about our dreadful attendance.


Last night’s Molineux crowd was the lowest league gate in 13 years despite Wolves’ return to the League One summit.
blah blah blah blah..
"




Goodbye Horse

"Is this a story? We are constantly remained that we are are a third tier club, so why why aren't third tier gates expected? How about this for a headline " Despite successive relegations, on a bitterly cold night just before Christmas, an amazing 15000 loyal supporters turn out to cheer the Wolves to a table topping position"
Positivity, that's all it is"


"You probably hear comments like this all the time," oh well said" etc,
but Goodbye horse you should write for the E&S, I read your post and straight away the positive feelings came back! after reading the original headline i thought oh dear we are loosing support, but you are RIGHT.
well written and more factual than the headline from our usual E&S stirrers"



"Week in, week out the E&S seeks to find a negative rather than focus on the positives of what is going on at Molineux.
We keep getting reports that seem designed to create divisions amongst the fans regarding Jamie O'Hara. Before that they were stirring things up about Sako for the "crime" of having Forest wanting to sign him. Pre season there were similar reports re Doyle, his wages and Celtic.
And who can forget the E&S spending a week building up the so called "fans protest" last season that turn out to be supported by about 50 fans.
Kenny Jackett's new look, young team have slowly but surely won over the vast majority of the fans but the E&S still highlight what they perceive to be the negatives"




"Erm, excuse the cliche, but 'well said', mate.
The expense of two home games in the space of three days; sheer brass monkey weather to contend with and, of course, the highly alluring, magnetic attraction of Third Division football in the form of Merseyside giants, Liverpool -erm, sorry, I mean Tranmere Rovers- and their small band of followers. Quite frankly, to get 15,000 in those circumstances is highly creditable and speaks volumes for the loyal support Wolves enjoy.
Contrast that to Monday night's much-publicised, Premier League, 'Brummie Derby' between Tesco Town and Aston Villa at The Hawthorns where the attendance was only 9,500 higher than Wolves' gate, despite there only being 2 or 3 miles distance between the two rivals' grounds. And you won't need reminding that the game was played a whole two divisions higher than the one at Molineux.
Never mind those gloomy headlines knocking Wolves' attendance: it's the Tescos who should be more worried. It's just a good job those 'travelling' Villa fans sold out their full ticket allocation, that's all I can say"
 
You have to go to Reading, 7th in the Championship, to find a club with a higher average attendance...
 
Wavey. We're over here Tim. Does he have a phobia of looking directly at the camera?
 
Ive been looking for an E&S feature on the 22,000 at the Poorthorns last night..(cant find one)
They seem to like to paint a negative picture on our attendances, so im assuming there will be an exclusive indepth article on wba's worrying attendance figures, what with this being the greatest league in the whole wide world an all that.
 
Aye. Apparently Hennessy is going to be sold soon too...
 
Why on earth has the E&S got 2 seperate stories of Roger Johnsons first game for west ham?

FFS :facepalm:
 
To be fair them, a LOT of Wolves fans are talking about him, so its kind of relevent(ish)
 
Todays E&S Poll!!!!!

Which Wolves striker would you most like to see stay at Molineux?


Yes
No

Vote

so far 81.62% have said YES to Which Wolves striker would you most like to see stay at Molineux?
where as 18.38% have said NO
 
That is a pretty impressive fail to be honest.
 
It's not much better now it's been fixed. Which one of these three strikers would you like to stay at Molineux - Griffiths, Doyle or Siggy. No option for Cassidy or McAlinden and no options for 2 of the three, or all three. Obviously most people will vote for Griffiths. What exactly are they trying to achieve?
 
It's not much better now it's been fixed. Which one of these three strikers would you like to stay at Molineux - Griffiths, Doyle or Siggy. No option for Cassidy or McAlinden and no options for 2 of the three, or all three. Obviously most people will vote for Griffiths. What exactly are they trying to achieve?

It's the guess & stir at it's finest again, maybe they think they are the 3 who are most likely to leave.
 
Considering those 3 are the ones linked with moves away, I'd suggest it makes perfect sense.
 
looking at botht he story, then the photograph & the poll is a massive contradiction.
The quotes from Jackett refer to the possibility of looking to loan a couple of younger players out if we did sign another striker.
The 3 in the poll/photograph aren't even referred to in the article or interview from a pov of us looking to move them on!
 
Credit where it is due; their Bert Williams stuff tonight is very well done.
 
Back
Top