Tony Towner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 38,499
- Reaction score
- 24,848
They are also the Cats you'd expect A,B,A so pricey
Because broadcasting infrastructure costs a load of money and requires a whole host of employees who know what they're doing.I actually think a premier league streaming service will be here in the next few years, pay to view every league game, absolutely no idea why they rely on Sky, etc, when they could make much, much more.
Don't PL already have a ton of in house people? When you watch PL overseas its usually a generic PL broadcasting team outside of the larger marketsBecause broadcasting infrastructure costs a load of money and requires a whole host of employees who know what they're doing.
Why shell out for all that when Sky and TNT will do it for you AND pay you handsomely along the way?
Ligue Un didn't have a TV deal until last week, they've accepted a lowish bid rather than go in-house and direct to the customer because it's far, far too risky. It might well happen one day but not particularly soon.
Not talking about commentators etc (they're ten a penny) or even camera operators, match directors or whatever.Don't PL already have a ton of in house people? When you watch PL overseas its usually a generic PL broadcasting team outside of the larger markets
Would you be willing to pay 20 quid a month to someone similar to Amazon to stream every PL game?Not talking about commentators etc (they're ten a penny) or even camera operators, match directors or whatever.
They're not currently offering bespoke streaming of individual games direct to the customer anywhere in the world, it's a minefield. Amazon got it badly wrong with their first attempt when they got rights, it didn't work properly off the app at all.
Yeah. But they wouldn't charge that, they'd charge absolutely miles more.Would you be willing to pay 20 quid a month to someone similar to Amazon to stream every PL game?
You are probably correct, but at that price they'd get millions signed up world wide, the finances add up and the technology is there.Yeah. But they wouldn't charge that, they'd charge absolutely miles more.
So you reckon those numbers are just made up?Remember they never actually said we'd sold ~22k season tickets like before. They just said they were "sold out". So could be way more.
Two of our first three home games are on TV and the other is a Sunday at 2pm (which puts some walk-ups off), if they've got thousands of empty seats then they've only got themselves to blame.
Let's look at it logically. They brazenly lie about other clubs' prices and where we sit (done that more than once), managed to brag that at least we don't have tiered pricing within a single stand like other clubs (er, we do) and every other year they've announced the final number...this year they haven't. Outside of ticketing they lied to Lopetegui to get him on board and have lied to us about how/why we can't spend anything in the transfer market.So you reckon those numbers are just made up?
The NFL version is £150.99 for the season, so given the additional number of games each team plays you'd probably be looking at double.Would you be willing to pay 20 quid a month to someone similar to Amazon to stream every PL game?
It'll happen at the end of the next tv deal with SkY.Because broadcasting infrastructure costs a load of money and requires a whole host of employees who know what they're doing.
Why shell out for all that when Sky and TNT will do it for you AND pay you handsomely along the way?
Ligue Un didn't have a TV deal until last week, they've accepted a lowish bid rather than go in-house and direct to the customer because it's far, far too risky. It might well happen one day but not particularly soon.
The Jeff Shi of the ticket touting world...The sad thing about this increase is the price I have to let my ticket go if I become ill (Which is often these days) or I'm gigging. I never used to ask a lot but christ I can't ask for anything less then £45 now.
Oddly the ad revenue isn't. And it would be a net zero for the broadcasters as they'd still need to pay a huge amount to a third party are gazillions to say up their own systems.You are probably correct, but at that price they'd get millions signed up world wide, the finances add up and the technology is there.
Yeah, this is the kicker.Oddly the ad revenue isn't. And it would be a net zero for the broadcasters as they'd still need to pay a huge amount to a third party are gazillions to say up their own systems.
Nope, not even close.If you can get 10m subscibers worldwide even at an average of 20 quid a month, then surely that would create a profit on what sky etc new deals pay?
Probably wrong place for the chat, so will leave it.
It isn't just SKY you have all the overseas broadcasters the PL sell to already.If you can get 10m subscibers worldwide even at an average of 20 quid a month, then surely that would create a profit on what sky etc new deals pay?
Probably wrong place for the chat, so will leave it.