• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Relegation run in 22/23 ** Now a Wolves free zone**

Apparently Arsenal goal being ruled out Leicester is ridiculous
 
Yeah, maybe. I’m just not sure he affects Ward as much as made out. Guess he’s got hold of Ward’s arm but it’s so weak.
Imho it doesn't really matter if it affects ward materially or not, grabbing a keepers hand / arm whilst they're jumping gives someone a decision to make.
 
So what’s the ideal scenario here? Leeds-Saints draw, and everyone else below us to lose (plus Palace)?
 
Imho it doesn't really matter if it affects ward materially or not, grabbing a keepers hand / arm whilst they're jumping gives someone a decision to make.
If it was the NFL I'd be screaming for pass interference to be called; kind of how I'm thinking about it.

If the GK's advantage is supposed to be using his hands and half of that equation gets taken away, it's got to be a foul, IMO.
 
Side note:

Peter Bankes is just as shit for other teams as he is for us, turns out. Big "making it up as I go" vibes from him in this Leeds v. Southampton match.
 
The responses on this thread says it all really some think it is some don’t tells me it’s not clear and obvious so the onfield decisions should be kept.
 
Listening to reports sounds like another mr Magoo performance by Forest but they’re still level.
 
If it was the NFL I'd be screaming for pass interference to be called; kind of how I'm thinking about it.

If the GK's advantage is supposed to be using his hands and half of that equation gets taken away, it's got to be a foul, IMO.
I can't see how they can let a player get away with holding a keepers arm. It would set a precedent that it's ok to do so.
 
Grabbing a keeper's arm is no different to kicking an outfield player's standing leg. Looks pretty clear and obvious when you look at it that he's grabbed his arm so the correct decision.
 
Back
Top