• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

REFERENDUM RESULTS AND DISCUSSION THREAD

.
ece6c359d0f7690052fde8a040c4979e.jpg
 
From Twitter...

On Saturday Keir Starmer clarified Labour's approach into 4 phases.

1. We vote down Theresa May’s deal.

2. We fight for a general election. If we can’t achieve that…

3. We push, in Parliament, for Labour’s much softer version of Brexit during the next two weeks.

4. And if that fails we fight for a second referendum.
 
leedswolf said:
.
707dd50fe748a44900a77c301dec1b78.jpg
2b18691ab0d8c8c40c5369b0562e177b.jpg
Click to expand...

Basically stop dicking around and pretending no deal is a real possibility so we can all start having grown up conversations about what to do next.

Over the next few weeks May will have a choice between appeasing the 40-50 nutters in her party or working together with Labour for the common good. I'd be stunned if she chose the latter.
 
Yep. She perpetually has the air of someone who has a 200+ majority in the Commons.

She's a very strange person (as well as an awful one).
 
Oh aye, this much was obvious at the time. Same applied with his non-specific rhetoric about cutting welfare. He didn't think he'd win an overall majority anyway (why should they have, they were bloody awful for five years) and so once he went into another coalition, they could get rid a load of the rabble rousing right wing crap that got the blue rinse brigade all excited. Just say the other lot won't let that fly, the bastards. Only then they erm, won.

Even if he decided he was bound to his stupid promise, there were so many better ways to do it. I think he actually went ahead with it a year ahead of schedule, the ham faced moron.

As for "not leading a Government that wouldn't hold a referendum"...riiiiight. How would he have possibly got one through a Cabinet where he'd have had to use Lib Dems (presumably) again? Which other coalition partners was he thinking that he'd have? Pretty sure only UKIP were expressly anti-EU at the time and they had zero chance of getting to that point.
 
Hang on. That is effectively insider dealing on the commodities market rather than the stock market. It isn't the having the information - most investors would tell you that gold is a good safe haven in times of trouble. It is the fact that this wanker can actually influence whether the bad times will happen that he intends to profit from.

Questions should be asked about the legality of that position.
 
Brittany ferries cancelling passengers bookings,due to needing the possible capacity for emergency deliveries of medicines and food in a no deal brexit
 
Sir James Dyson, the British billionaire inventor and outspoken Brexiter, is moving the headquarters of his vacuum cleaner and hair dryer technology company to Singapore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

darlowolf64
  • Locked
The Clique and how to join it...
Replies
6
Views
2K
The Bear
The Bear
lemonjelly
The Mental Health thread
49 50 51
Replies
1K
Views
101K
Del Woppio
Del Woppio
Back
Top