Agreed. But my point was that we canvas as much relevant information as possible. Whilst the economists won't be spot on, and vary in their conclusions, there is a huge, significant majority of them who are predicting reductions.
Yes, I've pointed to 2 studies which conclude a 1.1% difference, and yes that difference may be massive. Buts they're both negative. Almost all the forecasts are negative. Which surely highlights huge risk. Possibly unnecessary risk. I'm not seeing any positive forecasts. Maybe I'm not looking in the right places?
That reduction in GDP will result in (for a period of time at least - we don't know how long) reduced funding for health, transport, education, the arts, social care, and numerous other essential aspects of life. Numerous academic studies have shown that reduced public spending results in increased earlier deaths. Preventable deaths. We've had that since 2010. We're risking that for the next 10-20 years. Thats my parents, yours, maybe even us, dying early as a result.