She's wrong. I heard it from a Premier League director trying to sign Coady that Wolves were proposing a deal of just under £8m up front, around £4m to sign permanently.
We’ve got all our scouts lifting stones across Europe in case we missed someone.Wolves could move for new head coach before 2023
Wolves could move for a new head coach before 2023 if the right candidate is found, the Express & Star understands.www.expressandstar.com
Liam here has either had a nod or is just bored and needed to do an article
Although saying Wolves could go back on their statement that there isn't a suitable candidate after the defeat v Leicester....if there is a suitable candidate available, just sounds odd.
My friend text me this information a few weeks ago. Its a mess
That's quite clearly what I didn't say. It's you who claims to not know what an analyst does, although I suspect you do. He pretty much spells it out in the link I gave to you. The various data he collects on both the first team and the opposition is utilised by the coaching staff. He doesn't pick the team, decide on tactics or substitutions. It's not difficult.
My point was only to defend the honesty of Steve Davis. He stated that he picked the team, decided on tactics and substitutions. Pearson had a team of people, all working in the overall analysis of the first team and their opposition. As many of these left with Bruno Lage we're told by Davis and others that Sellars is just one of the people is helping with the necessary data collection. That analysis will take various forms and will be used by the coaching staff as they see fit. For example that may be an analysis of how the opposition are setting up at certain set pieces. If that analysis 'seeps into the collective thinking of the coaching staff' then that's exactly what it's supposed to do. If the expectation that a certain player was going to take up a particular position and is actually in a slightly different position which is then affecting our ability to attack or defend then again it's hoped that that information is accurately relayed to the coach, Davis. He can then assess whether he needs to make changes. What the analysts aren't doing is picking the team, deciding on tactics or substitutions.
No, not at all. I'm not sure why you'd think that I'd think that 'everything was good". Wolves is a car crash that's been a long time coming. The driver of that car is Jeff Shi. His failures have been well documented so it's pointless listing them again. I was devastated to learn Coady was being sold and I still am to be honest. He was my favorite player and a leader we haven't come close to replacing. As much as I love Neves he's not a natural leader. Looks like he's gone anyway in January according to Tony Roberts.
Not. A. Clue.
You've literally lifted this straight from the two articles without displaying any understanding as you've conflated scouting with analysts and analysis.
Whilst I think you are correct re Lopetegui, I doubt they have any guarantee from him and even if they did it's not worth anything. You'd be waiting on 2 things, his father to die/health improve and then him eventually coming. I have absolute confidence he's not coming to us 5 or 6 points off safety.
Either that or waiting to be sold.
Make your mind up. First you say I've lifted straight from the Matt Pearson article (where he details his role as a 'performance analyst') then say I've conflated it with scouting. Scouting, as I understand it, is assessing individual players suitability for purchase by the club. None of which I mentioned. The general examples I tried to give are very much part (however small) of the role of an analyst.
I can see you haven't.
