Watford is not going to be an easy game for us . They're on a roll with Pearson . A win there coupled with the wins over Man City and Norwich plus the really good display yesterday would make it a damn good Christmas .
It's not Liverpool's fault. They didn't make the complaint, an unknown person did.If not then Wolves should complain to Liverpool about the conduct of their ball boys
Traore spoke very positively about Liverpool before the game, can't remember exactly where I saw it though. Nice thing for us is he would now command close to £50million perhaps?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
https://twitter.com/flowin74/status/1211596746347995136?s=19
I can accept a number of VAR fuckovers, but the Everton one still grinds my gears.
Fair point! Not consistent though obviously.You could say the 1 time VAR was properly used. They had a look (remember they look at everyhing but only tell us when it is time for super slow-mo looks) decided it was too close so went with the on field decision.
No review of VVD handball v Pool - mistake
.
I've seen the VVD 'handball' countless times and still not seen evidence to prove he touched it - the 2D still further up the thread doesn't.
I think VAR have retro fitted their inconclusive analysis, but if they had have reviewed it I don't think it would have disallowed the goal
When VVD was asked about the handball he said he couldn't remember. How convenient!
They wouldn't because if it did touch his arm it was an accident so doesn't count in the shitty handball rule but they clearly never looked at it as you got 2 different stories on the reason via the ref and VAR
Accidental hand ball does count if its in the build up to a goal,
Pretty sure that was the way it was explained when the goal was ruled out against Leicester. Either the scorer or assister has to have committed the handball. So van Dijk is only relevant if Lallana had took it down and scored himself.Stuff I was reading yesterday was saying it only counts if it directly leads to a goal. Apparently the pass to the guy who makes the assist doesn't count. Essentially since Day 1 of the season the handball rule has made zero sense and every time it happens another version of how the rule works comes out
Pretty sure that was the way it was explained when the goal was ruled out against Leicester. Either the scorer or assister has to have committed the handball. So van Dijk is only relevant if Lallana had took it down and scored himself.
Pretty sure that was the way it was explained when the goal was ruled out against Leicester. Either the scorer or assister has to have committed the handball. So van Dijk is only relevant if Lallana had took it down and scored himself.
What did you think he was going to say ??