PuntsWolf
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 15,892
- Reaction score
- 7,693
Isn’t a factorKeeper saves it if he doesn't handball it.
Isn’t a factorKeeper saves it if he doesn't handball it.
It is, because deliberate handball in of itself isn't a red card offence.Isn’t a factor
Professional fouls DGSO are though.Deliberate handball in itself
It is, because deliberate handball in of itself isn't a red card offence.
The double jeopardy must Inc hand balls thenProfessional fouls DGSO are though.
Or they made a mistake…The double jeopardy must Inc hand balls then
I mainly think his dad's a cunt.The spirit of Stearman lives on
Always a possibility of courseOr they made a mistake…
Same as the mistake they made against Mitrovic. AKA - bottling
But there's no guarantee that the ball goes in the net in this instance, in fact its pretty clear it hits Henderson if he doesn't handball it.Professional fouls DGSO are though.
But have you ever seen someone get a straight red card for handball unless its practically on the goal line and its definitely going in the goal (Suarez against Ghana being a prime example) or the goal is completely unguarded if a player doesn't handle it (for instance keeper rushes out of area and knocks it away and would have been an open goal)?
What Henderson would do isn’t a factor. He might have missed it, might have spilt it through his hands, might have punched it in his own net.But there's no guarantee that the ball goes in the net in this instance, in fact its pretty clear it hits Henderson if he doesn't handball it.
Its definitely semantics though because if I deliberately haul you down in the penalty area when you're one on one with the keeper then I'm getting sent off (no guarantee that you'd score). But have you ever seen someone get a straight red card for handball unless its practically on the goal line and its definitely going in the goal (Suarez against Ghana being a prime example) or the goal is completely unguarded if a player doesn't handle it (for instance keeper rushes out of area and knocks it away and would have been an open goal)?
But quite clearly it is as its why he wasn't sent off.What Henderson would do isn’t a factor. He might have missed it, might have spilt it through his hands, might have punched it in his own net.
Same as any decision isn’t a factor what would happen after. Players gets booked all the time for breaking up attacks when the player has already practically lost the ball running into 3 players or even out of play.
A lot of words for me to repeat “Henderson isn’t a factor”
Link doesn't work, but searched it and clearly the Ox is the last man in that case (and the keeper was beaten) which is why (rightly or wrongly) it was given as a red.
Wasn't going in. And they got the wrong player!
A shot on goal is a clear goal scoring opportunity. Same as a player running through on goal when he hasn’t even had a bloody shot yet or might not even do so!The rule wording is essentially
Delibrate handball is a red card if it denies a clear goal scoring opportunity.
So Henderson has been included in their thinking and his position to where the ball is heading. Whether that is right or not, at least 2 refs have called that based on the video.
I guess a foul when clear through is looked at differently.A shot on goal is a clear goal scoring opportunity. Same as a player running through on goal when he hasn’t even had a bloody shot yet or might not even do so!
Henderson being included in that decision is wrong. It’s that simple. Hence the decision was wrong as I originally stated.