• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Jeremy Corbyn

Did he "openly support the IRA" or was he trying to get a political solution to a problem that seemed to have no solution by getting representatives of all "parties" to the discussion table?

Are you happy to support a government that openly supports the Saudi Arabian "government" that oppresses its people and a leader who shoots down a member of her own party for telling it like it is because she doesn't want to lose the arms sales?

As he has attended a service honouring the eight IRA terrorists shot by the SAS, and has shown a great reluctance to condemn the IRA, I think he does have sympathies with the IRA. And he took leading Republicans into the House of Commons shortly after the IRA attempted to kill the Prime Minister and other leading members of Government. Though to be fair he has also condemned all killings.

Regarding the Saudi arms deal, I do not claim to know a lot about it, but i do not agree with sending weapons that are being used in the manner they were in Yemen. And any prime Minister would take to task a minister speaking out of turn.
 
To be fair to Corbyn when it comes to the vote he has always stood against all forms of violence. Consistently voting against Britain's participation.
 
To be fair to Corbyn when it comes to the vote he has always stood against all forms of violence. Consistently voting against Britain's participation.

Yet rarely criticising other countries participation. God help us if this man is ever Prime Minister.
 
Yet rarely criticising other countries participation. God help us if this man is ever Prime Minister.

He has been quite vocal in his criticism of Saudi Arabia recently, along with your own Boris Johnson.

As for God intervening, I am pretty sure he's not that interested as he has turned a blind eye to both Cameron and May as they pile up debt, heap misery on the poor and vulnerable while provide weapons, assistance and aid to dubious regimes.
 
He has been quite vocal in his criticism of Saudi Arabia recently, along with your own Boris Johnson.

As for God intervening, I am pretty sure he's not that interested as he has turned a blind eye to both Cameron and May as they pile up debt, heap misery on the poor and vulnerable while provide weapons, assistance and aid to dubious regimes.

Just a shame he wasn't so critical of the IRA terrorists.
 
Just a shame he wasn't so critical of the IRA terrorists.

I am rather more concerned by what is happening now. You have previously said you would vote Conservative tomorrow so I guess that means you support increasing debt, cuts that impact harshly on the most vulnerable in society and a government that provides arms and aid to countries like Saudi Arabia and who sell our assets to undemocratic so countries like Qatar and China who both have very dubious human rights records.
 
Peter Tatchell and cohorts rearing his ugly head to tell Corbs to pull his finger out.
Why didn't he just email him or summat? Would have been less embarrassing I would have thought.
Amusing nonetheless.
 
Rail strikes and Postal workers strikes, but not a word from Corbyn. Mind you the rail unions funded his leadership campaign so they have him in their pocket.

And now Argos drivers are to strike on the run up to Christmas and a spokesman for Unite said it would cause "havoc and chaos" for the retailer. But what about the consumer? Not that the union barons have ever bothered about the hardships their actions bring to people.
 
Frank, have you looked up why Southern Rail and the Postal Service are striking? Also, are you expecting him to condemn it (and worse) like the government?
 
Yes I know the reason the unions have gone on strike, and of course Corbyn would never condemn them. He is just a puppet in the hands of the unions and Momentum.

Do you think strikes ever really achieve anything?
 
Yes I know the reason the unions have gone on strike, and of course Corbyn would never condemn them. He is just a puppet in the hands of the unions and Momentum.

Do you think strikes ever really achieve anything?

Do you think allowing a bully government to pull down your pants and give you a good spanking has achieved anything apart from the shit that the Country is in right now?

The reason for the strikes by Southern is safety, if you travel on their trains at any time in the future it will be YOUR safety!
"Driver only trains", Government argument... "It's all about money and making the commuters suffer, Thames Link run driver only trains"
REAL REASON... Thames Link are a product of the last time the Conservatives ran a "campaign" against the railway. The sold it off and introduced us to the 'wonderfully successful'* Railtrack (*They weren't wonderful or successful) as well as splitting the maintenance teams and selling them off to Jarvis who did such a wonderful job at an extortionate price that they gave us the Potters Bar, Ladbroke Grove, Paddington and Southall train crashes. After this the maintenance has been brought back in house and not so many disasters any more so what do the Torys want? To send the Maintenance back out to private companies :wallbash:
Thames Link run 3 to 5 carriage trains and the driver can see front to back when the train is stopped so SHOULDN'T trap anyone in the doors and drive away
Southern run 8 to 11 carriage trains and the driver CAN NOT see the length of the train because of arched platforms. He will be expected to keep an eye on up to 12 tiny cctv screens in his cab while making sure he takes the correct signal and aspect as well as pulls away safely, drive his train correctly, sort out all issues when some drunk pull the emergency stop handle etc.
Role of the "guard". He is fully trained in all emergency procedures and in the event of an accident will be there to assist the passengers/protect the train/report to the Signaller. He is essential in these circumstances because, if it's a crash at the front of the train, the driver won't be any use.

Oh and don't get me started on HS2! What a complete and utter waste of money, in London, AGAIN.
Hundreds of millions of pounds to save a few minutes between Birmingham/Leeds and London. How about spend the money on improving the WHOLE rail network, stick down some designated "non-stop", express lines into London if you must but put the majority of the money into improving things on the network for ALL travellers and not just the "elite" who are heading into the City. Put the money into cutting fares so that people can afford to travel on the railway, make the Train Operating Companies stick extra carriages on their trains so people who pay for a seat GET a seat!

Finally, back to Southern... The RMT and ASLEF went to Southern with proposals SIX MONTHS AGO that were, in principle, acceptable to the company but they had to run it by the Dept for Transport, Conservative run, who rejected the offer as they would see it as having to "climb down"...Way to go. The strikes are down to this Conservative government, it could of been settled MONTHS ago but they won't tell the public that
 
Yeah, it's not because of safety, that's just the union line

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/13/southern-strike-passenger-misery-amid-worst-rail-disruption


In a letter to the Transport Select Committee, he said: "Trains with doors operated by drivers (known in the industry as Driver Only Operation) have been in operation in Great Britain for more than 30 years.

"ORR has scrutinised this approach, and our inspectors are satisfied that, with suitable equipment, proper procedures and competent staff in place, it is a safe method of working."
 
Yeah, it's not because of safety, that's just the union line

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/13/southern-strike-passenger-misery-amid-worst-rail-disruption


In a letter to the Transport Select Committee, he said: "Trains with doors operated by drivers (known in the industry as Driver Only Operation) have been in operation in Great Britain for more than 30 years.

"ORR has scrutinised this approach, and our inspectors are satisfied that, with suitable equipment, proper procedures and competent staff in place, it is a safe method of working."

There is your main problem....there is no suitable equipment in place on the long trains Southern use and are they really calling Train Drivers "incompetent"? what do they do for a living? DRIVE TRAINS to an extremely high standard...Try having a look at the complex rail network in London and tell me they need more responsibility put on them
 
Oh and that famous Tory, friend of the common people, Sir Ian Prosser has said so, in a Tory paper so it's all good!
 
Also...The trains that have "safely run on the railway for 30 years" are, as I pointed out if you actually cared to read it, only about 4 carriages long and NOT 9 to 11 carriages long
 
Going back to hs2, isn't the argument that the current situation, mixing fast and slow trains in the WCML is very inefficient, so splitting the former off onto hs2 makes the WCML considerably more performant?
 
Going back to hs2, isn't the argument that the current situation, mixing fast and slow trains in the WCML is very inefficient, so splitting the former off onto hs2 makes the WCML considerably more performant?

Oh yes but my point is this...A few years ago HS1 was instigated. The money was plowed into "improving" the infrastructure in and around London until the money ran out. We now come to HS2 and do they start by spending the money on the rail network on the West Coast and down to London? NOPE, they spend the money in and around London...AGAIN...Until it runs out and there will still be no improvement on the WCML
 

Which doesn't work. Where I work, less than 50% of the workforce are in a union, just five years ago it was 65%, and yes the union agreed wage agreement would not be bettered in favour of non union members, but there are many other ways to achieve better conditions.

Unite have now resorted to offering reduced monthly dues in an attempt to stop the flood of Alliance Healthcare workers leaving the union.

I am not a member of a trade union, and have no intention of being one. Union barons say one thing and do the other. The late Mr Crow is a good example of this. Earning a fortune, getting his members to go on strike and lose money, while he was sunning himself.
 
Back
Top