• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

January 2021 Transfer Window

Fortunate to find that we have an alternative in a back 4? Or a plan Nuno has been working on? Tbc

January could also be a big month, we could either be undefeated or it could be a nil point month. Tbc.

What I will also say is, we lost Raul to an awful injury on Sunday. And then we scored two goals. We currently have a replacement (also Tbc if he's good enough) and there's no need to start thinking of outside the box/square peg solutions until we find out how good he is.
Donck and Kilman as attackers is probably the worst attacking line up I've ever heard of.
I never put Kilman in an attacking position FFS you didnt read the post, you jumped on the bandwagon. the subsitutes took it to 3-4-3 with Kilman going into the back three.
 
You do realise we just comfortably beat Arsenal away in difficult circumstances with said 18 year old?

And how was 4 at the back luck!? He didn’t draw it out a hat.
would he have played it had Coady not been self isolating?

I

Think


Not.
 
Come on Cyber, we all have shockers every now and again. Take it on the chin, admit it was a bit daft and move on. No harm done.
And thats fair enough. It was an idea and not a very good one that has been put to bed. However , manners and respect cost very little.
 
I'm not being arrogant, you're talking absolute nonsense.

Go and ask 50,000 Wolves fans if you like, "should we play Leander Dendoncker up front". Pretty sure less than 0.1% will say "yes". Or if you like, fewer than the number of people who vote for "Colin Chicken" or whoever in local elections.

If you don't want derision then don't post utter drivel and get huffy about it.
 
The 4 at the back wasn't by luck it was by design. Marcal, Hoever and Dendoncker could have played in a 3 and there were options a plenty elsewhere to make it work.
The fact that he stuck to it after Coady returned reinforces this.

Maybe the way Nuno has spoken about evolution and becoming less predictable, the four at the back has been always been his plan for this season?
 
I'm not being arrogant, you're talking absolute nonsense.

Go and ask 50,000 Wolves fans if you like, "should we play Leander Dendoncker up front". Pretty sure less than 0.1% will say "yes". Or if you like, fewer than the number of people who vote for "Colin Chicken" or whoever in local elections.

If you don't want derision then don't post utter drivel and get huffy about it.
I get huffy when people like you get all c--tish and cocky with your response with unnecessary childish put downs. I have told you before , you are better than that and you dont need to be rude. I suppose its Manchester University Humour that flies over my head.
 
Yes, I am definitely the problem, my apologies.

Sorry for being from the lofty heights of er, South Manchester, it does make me look down on people.

Back to the real world now please.
 
Cyber has the hump because we weren't shit in November like he always claims, maybe he isn't the fantastic mystic he thinks he is.
Balotelli could settle down in Wolverhampton, doesn't/didn't his dad live in park village or heathtown? I think he'd fail the no dickheads policy just a shade though
 
I can see why Cyber thought Donck would have decent attributes as a CF late on in games and it isn't totally without merit.

He'd be like an Ndaiye-max
 
Good runner - check
Decent in the air - check
Physical presence - check

If we take Silva off we don't have anyone else in the squad with those attributes who isn't a CB
 
We do, Otasowie.

Fancy banging him up top?

It's crazy. As I say, can we get back to the real world?
 
It's only mental if you're saying Donck would play as a striker. He wouldn't be, he's there to be a pain in the ass when were under the kosh
 
Good runner - check
Decent in the air - check
Physical presence - check

If we take Silva off we don't have anyone else in the squad with those attributes who isn't a CB

So why didn't Klopp play VVD up front all game or Pep play Dias and Stones up top instead of short arse Aguero?

It's not a very good idea as conceded by Cyber, quite why you're running with this is beyond me.
 
So why didn't Klopp play VVD up front all game or Pep play Dias and Stones up top instead of short arse Aguero?

It's not a very good idea as conceded by Cyber, quite why you're running with this is beyond me.
Cyber gave the specific scenario of 70 odd minutes, we're protecting a lead and need some to harass, and try to get us up the pitch a bit.

I'm not proposing an Aden Flint style lump it at a big CB, nor would I propose starting Donck as a forward
 
Cyber gave the specific scenario of 70 odd minutes, we're protecting a lead and need some to harass, and try to get us up the pitch a bit.

I'm not proposing an Aden Flint style lump it at a big CB, nor would I propose starting Donck as a forward
someone reads them . Thank you.

It was an idea. A bad one but an idea.
 
Are we wearing our home or away strip?

And what's the weather like in this scenario?
 
Some fairly 'interesting :D:rolleyes:' suggestions being made!

If Silva cannot make the full 90 (& he might not yet seeing as how he has had very little top level football) then until we evaluate Raul's situation and bring in another if needed then Neto is the choice to take over in the middle - not a natural position for him but with what he's shown then he's the more natural fit from those we have.
 
Back
Top