• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

I miss Johnny because...............?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You spamming every thread with four or five smug posts in a row does not constitute adding colour
Every thread? 4 or 5? Smug?

It's just not true is it.

Debate with me, tell me why you think i'm wrong or smug, but just posting criticism and not actually explaining what that criticism is based on is not great is it?
 
Very interesting to see the predictable group overjoyed by this news
If you mean the people that have continually been abused, ridiculed, patronised, threatened, just generally made to feel irritated and felt uncomfortable about posting, then yes.

Those people are pleased.
 
Last edited:
That's a shame. He went a bit too far sometimes but I liked Johnny :(

He's a way better poster than someone who just spams threads with their deliberate attention seeking WUM nonsense. (I won't mention the main culprit by name but he is one of the few posters who have driven me to use the igonre function).
 
Very interesting to see the predictable group overjoyed by this news
I count both Johnny and EP as personal friends and they appear to be fire and ice in this argument. So other than being the Derek Smalls lukewarm water here, what I would say is that a permanent ban doesn't seem right to me when there are multiple posters that are far worse and contribute ZERO other than pointless antagonism and forum politics.

But hey, I don't have any say here. I'm Ross Kemp on the verge of joining Family Affairs. They're good people. There's no bullying at Family Affairs.
 
Every single report that's made gets looked at, so if you feel someone has overstepped the line for whatever reason then please use the report function and it'll get discussed. Everyone is treated the same.

We generally try and keep things lenient and not be a forum that dishes out bans for every single insult or case of bad language. Context and intent matters and we take previous behaviour into account if it's just a one off or out of character. We also warn and have a word with people over PM which members don't always see.

This particular situation has been rumbling on for a long time now with numerous warnings and short term bans. The collective opinion is that it was the final straw when he expressed that he'd enjoy seeing another forum member's head stoved in.

Plus you also wouldn't be aware of the abusive language he often directed at the moderating team and other posters in the comments section of the report function when he used to report other posters. Those comments aren't seen publicly either.

The reason I'm telling you this is that it's never as black and white or simplistic as it seems on the surface.
 
As my old mom used to say when I was a kid, “sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me”.
 
Johnny has multiple times been banned for unpleasant and aggressive posting towards others. He trolls people's posts with passive aggressive responses and plays victim when people react. In my opinion the people who are defending him fall into 1 of 2 categories:

1. They are not someone who has been a victim of his unpleasant behaviour, or

2. They act in a very similar way so see nothing wrong with it.

He's no great loss, and the people on here making him out to be some kind of fucking martyr need to ask themselves why are they happy to condone the constant bullshit that he has perpetrated on here? Would you be happy to have been targeted (and I use this word advisedly because he deliberately has targeted people he has had disagreements with) by him?
 
That's a shame. He went a bit too far sometimes but I liked Johnny :(

He's a way better poster than someone who just spams threads with their deliberate attention seeking WUM nonsense. (I won't mention the main culprit by name but he is one of the few posters who have driven me to use the igonre function).
I have no idea how me disagreeing with someone, or seeking clarification is deemed attention seeking?

But each to their own.
 
I get that.

How about saying it was a unanimous decision when it wasn't? Seems a bit disingenuous to me.
Yes that was a mistake as no-one said any different until the ban was enforced. I'll edit it.
 
In my opinion the people who are defending him fall into 1 of 2 categories:

1. They are not someone who has been a victim of his unpleasant behaviour, or

2. They act in a very similar way so see nothing wrong with it.
Not so much defending him, just I can think of way worse that gets let go.

As for the two points:

1. He wouldn't dare. You don't bring a butter knife when the other guy has an Uzi :D

2. I hope you don't think I do
 
1. He wouldn't dare. You don't bring a butter knife when the other guy has an Uzi :D
I think this is a good point, he often disagrees with you or Del, but he doesn't dare go at you two in the same way as he would at others he has less respect for.

So you don't experience it and therefore don't really understand what Dire is saying.

He has made posting on here a misery for loads of, and many have just stopped posting as a result.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top