General Wolves News

[PuntsWolf]

The twitter post does make that link but not explicitly. Paddy and Billy have said this too, are we all wrong?

Well you and others made the link, not EP (also ignoring that the thread is nothing about FFP in the first place).

What was unacceptable?

So telling EP

I've no idea why people keep doing this and no idea why you keep posting these idiots.

When he hadn’t done it…

Then this

Such a coincidence that you keep posting these things whilst questioning FFP isn't it?

We got promoted in 2018 btw.

Making the assumption he was using it as some form of FFP discussion, not inocently just posting the leagues spends.

I didn’t understand why you responded the way you did, so tried to understand it in my posts afterwards.

In still don’t understand, no one else sees an issue, so that’s the end of it.

 

[Jinky]

Chelsea are only managing to keep their heads above water since Boehly took over by selling enough players to just about offset it. They need to start making profits very soon though or they'll be in trouble due to previous losses.

They’ve spent over 1 billion. How much have they generated in player sales to offset it?

(I’m genuinely interested as I have no idea how they can get away with spending so much, then you have clubs like us, Everton - even Utd to a degree, toeing the FFP line)

 

[The Bear]

They’ve spent over 1 billion. How much have they generated in player sales to offset it?

(I’m genuinely interested as I have no idea how they can get away with spending so much, then you have clubs like us, Everton - even Utd to a degree, toeing the FFP line)

This was a good read on it and where I got my info.

Why Chelsea believe their £900m transfer spending is within FFP rules

Chelsea are once again spending big. But they think their plan works. The question is - are they right?

theathletic.com

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

Well the eight year contracts make a difference. Hence I hope that loophole is properly closed.

I would need to look at who they have flogged.

 

[Johnny75]

Well you and others made the link, not EP (also ignoring that the thread is nothing about FFP in the first place).

So telling EP

When he hadn’t done it…

Then this

Making the assumption he was using it as some form of FFP discussion, not inocently just posting the leagues spends.

I didn’t understand why you responded the way you did, so tried to understand it in my posts afterwards.

In still don’t understand, no one else sees an issue, so that’s the end of it.

Sounds like a you problem.

You seem to have missed the number of posts EP has questioned FFP/ and those that have given their take on it across the forum over the last few weeks including posting tweets on finances.

That's the context you are missing.

Quite why you jumped in and called my posts unacceptable when not having that context is beyond me

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

With further regard to Chelsea I’m more interested in who has invested into the Boehly investment company (Clearsky or something) than what the Chelsea spend is.

The source of the money is key in that one.

 

[PuntsWolf]

Sounds like a you problem.

Well EP clearly, which is the most important one. If I’m wrong to interpret it the same as him then I’m OK with that.

You seem to have missed the number of posts EP has questioned FFP/ and those that have given their take on it across the forum over the last few weeks including posting tweets on finances.
That's the context you are missing.

Nope I’ve seen them. Just didn’t jump to the conclusion that he was linking them (as the thread wasn’t in itself), and clearly by his response he wasn’t either.

Quite why you jumped in and called my posts unacceptable when not having that context is beyond me

Not sure I’ve jumped in? I stated what I thought the purpose of the thread was (post 24979). Since has been a result of your assumption EP was referencing FFP, which I then “jumped in” on.

Why you posted the way you did is “beyond me”, but if that’s a me problem then I’m fine with that and will get over it and stay out of it.

 

[The Bear]

With further regard to Chelsea I’m more interested in who has invested into the Boehly investment company (Clearsky or something) than what the Chelsea spend is.

The source of the money is key in that one.

Yep it's definitely dodgy Saudi money and one of the reasons they are selling players to that league.

 

[The Bear]

Sounds like a you problem.

Oi stop stealing my lines!

 

[Tredman]

Yep it's definitely dodgy Saudi money and one of rhr reasons they are selling players to that league.

Maybe a mod should think a little bit more carefully about their posts .

 

[Quirkafleeg]

BTW The season ticket bonus has been paid out to season ticket holders, I've got 30 nicker.

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Sounds like a you problem.

You seem to have missed the number of posts EP has questioned FFP/ and those that have given their take on it across the forum over the last few weeks including posting tweets on finances.

That's the context you are missing.

Why is that context? It had nothing to do with me posting that, I saw the post on another forum, I thought it was interesting. So I posted it, I then get an arsey response from you because you think there is an agenda from me, there isn't and wasnt.

I think you look at the poster rather than the post all too often and that significantly effects the nature and tone of your response.

 

[The Bear]

Maybe a mod should think a little bit more carefully about their posts .

Ok then, it's more like Fosun and Gestifute. Where Fosun invest into that company for obvious reasons. Same with PIF and Clearlake.

 

[Tredman]

Ok then, it's more like Fosun and Gestifute. Where Fosun invest into that company for obvious reasons. Same with PIF and Clearlake.

It’s not though, there’s a clearly indentifiable link between Fosun and Gestifute. You’re just randomly spreading rumours you’ve read on twitter or similar.

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

Well to be fair that was me, but I was avoiding naming names specifically!

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

Santiago Bueno called up for Uruguay.

 

[Tony Towner]

Not ideal, means he's away until the Thursday with a lunchtime Saturday kick off. Means we will see one of the PL's worst centre half pairings again

 

[Alan]

Give Toti a chance next to Dawson. What have we got to lose at this point?

 

[lemonjelly]

the next game?

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

I'd be amazed if Kilman gets dropped, especially as he wasn't directly to blame for any of the goals yesterday.