Wolves 2-1 Leicester: Verdict Thread

[Kenny]

RAN was dick yesterday. Just own the heavy touch and get on with it. Don't hit the deck, roll around like your leg is broken then sudenly bounce back up.

As Dan mentioned earlier, then lucky not to do a Martinelli as after his recovery gave away a free kick with a daft challenge

 

[The Bear]

I hadn't seen the possible Saiss handball from Ricardo's shot. Looks like it should have been given.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1495735491722944521

They had a goal ruled out at Brighton this season for Barnes blocking the keeper's view, which was further away from the GK's eye line than Jimenez was:




Not that I'm complaining as we've had more than our fair share. Just the usual crap consistency from refs.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

No way Raul was interfering with play, he was moving away from the line of the ball and was never in Schmeichel's eyeline. Didn't unsight him in the slightest.

Their attacker nudged RAN in the back for the "backpass", was a free kick to us if anything.

 

[Kenny]

right or wrong it is a delight to read Leicester fans moaning about VAR againt us. Welcome to our world fuckers.

Maybe your manager shouldn't have been a smug prick everytime VAR went in your favour.

 

[Donegal Wolf]

Bear you have been spending too much time on the Leicester forums listening to their whining, like an Internet version of Stockholm syndrome.
Tell the cunts to fuck off and get banned it will do you good in the long run.

 

[YoungWolf]

I don't think any of those decisions are wrong!

 

[GLASGOWOLF]

I hadn't seen the possible Saiss handball from Ricardo's shot. Looks like it should have been given.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1495735491722944521

They had a goal ruled out at Brighton this season for Barnes blocking the keeper's view, which was further away from the GK's eye line than Jimenez was:

View attachment 5070


Not that I'm complaining as we've had more than our fair share. Just the usual crap consistency from refs.

To be a pen it has to strike the hand.
Bein showed it yesterday it hit his chest.
Just saw the second fuck me that was tight. His hand was in a Natural position, but seen so many given.
Was it Leicester the Killman one?

 

[The Bear]

No way Raul was interfering with play, he was moving away from the line of the ball and was never in Schmeichel's eyeline. Didn't unsight him in the slightest.

Their attacker nudged RAN in the back for the "backpass", was a free kick to us if anything.

Well he was definitely in his eye line (so was Soyuncu). That's not in debate, but I don't think it was interfering either. He was moving away like you say and Schmeichel wasn't getting there any way.

 

[Del Woppio]

I thought Raul was off tbh, he's definitely in his line of sight as Podence strikes the ball. And very lucky to get away with the second handball for me

 

[Elephant Pyjamas]

I thought Raul was off tbh, he's definitely in his line of sight as Podence strikes the ball. And very lucky to get away with the second handball for me

I agree, i also thought it was a back pass.

 

[Kenny]

I agree, i also thought it was a back pass.

Fom the refs angle on that he won't be able to see if that was RAN or the leicester player getting his foot to the ball. Normally would say rely on the assistant but they were fucking appalling yesterday

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

Oh God, the amount of throws they got wrong (for both teams) or just didn't make a decision and waited for Pawson to make a call. Amateur hour.

 

[Jinky]

Why Youri Tielemans and Ruben Neves’ performances capture their midfield purgatory

Wolves 2-1 Leicester City: Neves and Tielemans both possess top-tier skills but have yet to take the next step. Perhaps their respective performances at Molineux showed why, writes Dan Austin

www.independent.co.uk

I tell you what, I have read some rubbish in my time, but this is right up there. Genuinely wtf. Someone paid him to write this…

 

[Tony Towner]

The back pass wasn't one as RAN'S intention wasn't to play the ball like that, the impact from behind is what sent it to Sa.

The first handball isn't as even if it hits his hand it hits his chest first and therefore can't be.

The 2nd handball is in the seen then given camp, awkward when running as you can't keep your hands by your side, but some will give it, but given Kilman last year, fuck them.

The offside just isn't, if Podence's shot goes into the other corner then it's an argument, not the direction he hit it though, you can see Schmeichel looking around Raul as he sets himself and had clear sight all the way.

 

[PuntsWolf]

1) RAN doesn’t really play the ball, it just hits him, so isn’t a back pass. I think he’s trying to control it and boot it but the shove means just bounces off him.
2) Just isn’t handball for a million reasons.
3) I thought they’d disallow it. But I wouldn’t have been happy about it. It’s made no difference to the result of the shot.
4) arms are in a natural position (running motion), not handball.

 

[PuntsWolf]

TT too quick for me

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

I agree with both of you though! Very fair assessments.

 

[Kenny]

Flip it and we are going nuts over 2 of them.

Football is ace and on this one we get to laugh and flick the v's at the opposition fans

 

[Paddingtonwolf]

Which is always nice

 

[AndyWolves]

The decisions are what they are and not much can be done to affect them.

I'm more interested to know why Raul is offside anyway, I might be harsh but I think he should be having better awareness there. Even if podence had played him in he'd still be very offside