I knew they were rubbish and hadn’t had a single chance of note but I still worried when we were playing like absolute clowns in possession!I never felt worried really. The pen sort of came out of nothing. Don't think Sa had even taken a cross to that point, let alone made a save. Then they did nothing and just looked a jumbled mess of players. None of them playing anywhere. Of course we're well capable of creating our own chaos but other than Toti doing a couple of Paul Blades impressions, we had their measure.
Nothing to be proud of, of course. Like beating up Warwick Davis.
Thanks to the ref we could have had a minutes applause for him in additional time.Long time seat neighbours of mine are an Old timer and his son. Eccentric old fella was 93 or 94, loved Wolves, seen the very best teams and unlike most his age hated the Albion with a passion. Got to the ground today to find he'd passed away. RIP Bob, that one's for you.
Opinions innit.Can someone please put up a post where we can all vote (we being everyone who saw the game live or on tv) for every player who played?
It's really frustrating for everyone reading these posts to see, 'Podence played well', 'Podence was good in fits and starts', Podence was missing in action', 'Podence was shit again'. If people who saw it voted (out of 10) then we'd get a much better view of a player's performance.
It's a drag reading all of these posts then going to read the Guardian or whatever to find out who played well...
Can someone please put up a post where we can all vote (we being everyone who saw the game live or on tv) for every player who played?
It's really frustrating for everyone reading these posts to see, 'Podence played well', 'Podence was good in fits and starts', Podence was missing in action', 'Podence was shit again'. If people who saw it voted (out of 10) then we'd get a much better view of a player's performance.
It's a drag reading all of these posts then going to read the Guardian or whatever to find out who played well...
Podence was 7/10 some lovely flicks and touches but sometimes played risky balls in dangerous situations and put pressure on us.Can someone please put up a post where we can all vote (we being everyone who saw the game live or on tv) for every player who played?
It's really frustrating for everyone reading these posts to see, 'Podence played well', 'Podence was good in fits and starts', Podence was missing in action', 'Podence was shit again'. If people who saw it voted (out of 10) then we'd get a much better view of a player's performance.
It's a drag reading all of these posts then going to read the Guardian or whatever to find out who played well...
Yes, I get that, but when you get several strongly opinionated, and more confusingly, KNOWLEDGEABLE guys posting all sorts from one end of the spectrum to the other it's just muddy.If you cant read a match report posted on here without an arbitary number attached to decipher how well they played thats on you isn't it?
Traore was classic Traore, hot, cold and wasteful. Does anybody really need a 6/10 in addition to that for confirmation?
Nah 3/10Podence was 7/10 some lovely flicks and touches but sometimes played risky balls in dangerous situations and put pressure on us.
In other words, he was podence.
Can someone please put up a post where we can all vote (we being everyone who saw the game live or on tv) for every player who played?
It's really frustrating for everyone reading these posts to see, 'Podence played well', 'Podence was good in fits and starts', Podence was missing in action', 'Podence was shit again'. If people who saw it voted (out of 10) then we'd get a much better view of a player's performance.
It's a drag reading all of these posts then going to read the Guardian or whatever to find out who played well...
If Jonny rates Traore above 1 you know he was good.If I rate Costa as 3 and someone else rates him 7, does that help you?
Not really.