Surprised, would laugh if one of our rivals signed him, not very impressed at all but I might do something wholly outlandish like give him a chance and get behind him.
It's not even about how he does for me Langers. It's the direction the club is going in, Grant Holt isn't progress.
People have different views and we should really listen to them instead of lambasting I suppose. Although I still think he's crap ;-)
Which is fine, and dandy. I don't rate him that highly but I made the same mistake with BCI
Yeah, but I don't think anyone's planning to turn up tomorrow and boo him. Just on all the available evidence it's a terrible signing. If Adrian Chiles and Piers Morgan teamed up for a new chat show you'd pre-judge it as being appalling, given that Wigan have been paying other teams for Grant Holt to play for them for large chunks of the last two years it's fair to say he's unlikely to turn our season around. Even if we accept that we needed another striker (I don't think we did, but whatever) you cannot tell me that is the best possible one we could have got.
Which is fine, and dandy. I don't rate him that highly but I made the same mistake with BCI
He's the opposite to a progressive signing, that's for sure. But he's got experience and he's got strength and he's only here til January so it sounds to me more like a stop gap signings who may help off the pitch even if he can't help on it.
I think it's a poor signing but I think I'm one of the very few who can understand - if not wholly agree - with NWW.
I'm not advocating it but I'm sure as hell not calling for the bloody manager's head or setting fire to my season ticket in a hissy fit either!
It does allow us to send Bright out in loan - he needs the football.