• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

The Transfer Thread 2022/23- Everything not Wolves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Got me 4 round the wrong way. I thought it was 343.
Still 433 is where we want to be so the point stands in a roundabout way 😇
Just admit you're wrong.

Like you've been most of the day.

Like I pointed out earlier.

You wanted to be treated differently so you changed your username but you haven't changed the way you post.

It's frustrating to read this drivel Cyber it really is.
 
Just admit you're wrong.

Like you've been most of the day.

Like I pointed out earlier.

You wanted to be treated differently so you changed your username but you haven't changed the way you post.

It's frustrating to read this drivel Cyber it really is.
😂😂😂😂
I was wrong
I was wrong
I was wrong
I was wrong
I am so so sorry
I will try so hard never to make a genuine mistake again
Now please do a frozen and
 
Kulusevski is an £8.3m loan fee with an option to buy. Yep - dirt cheap that.
The loan fee is ridiculous, but you'd have to say the overall purchase package if they take up the option isn't all that bad if he is as good as the reports? Expensive if they don't though!

Looking at Swedish players, still can't believe anyone won't pay Isak's £75m release clause.
 
There's really not been anything I've seen that suggests Bruno will move us to a four at the back system like he played at Benfica.

He may be as smitten with our defensive record as I am. Why mess with a good thing at this point?
 
The loan fee is ridiculous, but you'd have to say the overall purchase package if they take up the option isn't all that bad if he is as good as the reports? Expensive if they don't though!

Looking at Swedish players, still can't believe anyone won't pay Isak's £75m release clause.
I'm surprised too. Isak looks very very good indeed. But £75m is a lot of money when Haaland is going to be about that in five months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlo
Isak seems to have lost his way a bit this season, only 4 league goals.
 
I would take Lingard in a heartbeat, think he is way underrated..compare him to Hwang for example, same work rate, but much better footballer and finisher..Dele Alli and his attitude never in a million years..not that keen on VdB either
 
There's really not been anything I've seen that suggests Bruno will move us to a four at the back system like he played at Benfica.

He may be as smitten with our defensive record as I am. Why mess with a good thing at this point?
I think it's widely agreed that he went with 3 centre halves as he quickly learned he couldn't trust 2, so it is a fair assumption that coupled with our scoring record means ideally he'd like to get an additional attacking option on the pitch at some point.
 
Chelsea trying to take Ousmane Dembele, which then allows Aubameyang to go to Barcelona. Interesting.
 
Lingard's career record is 90% total shite and 10% purple patches out of nowhere. In 2019/20 he came within seconds of going an entire league season of no goals and no assists (scored right at the death on the final day).

He had half a dozen or so good games for West Ham but was already tailing off badly towards the end of his spell there, their fans weren't all that sold on bringing him in permanently.

He's also 30 this year.
 
I think it's widely agreed that he went with 3 centre halves as he quickly learned he couldn't trust 2, so it is a fair assumption that coupled with our scoring record means ideally he'd like to get an additional attacking option on the pitch at some point.
I don't disagree that he likely made the switch out of necessity, I guess I just don't read most of his comments as trying to overhaul the squad. Perhaps he doesn't feel that an entire rebuild is necessary to make a back four work, though.
 
I don't disagree that he likely made the switch out of necessity, I guess I just don't read most of his comments as trying to overhaul the squad. Perhaps he doesn't feel that an entire rebuild is necessary to make a back four work, though.
In the Summer our options in a 2 were Boly maybe and ? There's nothing in the way Kilman has played this year that makes me think that's limited to being in a 3, there's one, Coady has improved massively in the strength and anticipation dept, so MAYBE he's another, but I'd still look to sign one this Summer. Semedo and RAN are both better full backs with a licence to get forward than out and out wing backs in my view. In essence you get that centre half and I think we are a better overall side. I'll be surprised if we start next season with a 3, assuming we spend a few quid
 
Chelsea trying to take Ousmane Dembele, which then allows Aubameyang to go to Barcelona. Interesting.
They will have a top class collection of wingers who only turn it on every one in five if that goes through. At an absolutely exorbitant cost too!
 
Lingard's career record is 90% total shite and 10% purple patches out of nowhere. In 2019/20 he came within seconds of going an entire league season of no goals and no assists (scored right at the death on the final day).

He had half a dozen or so good games for West Ham but was already tailing off badly towards the end of his spell there, their fans weren't all that sold on bringing him in permanently.

He's also 30 this year.
He has played for Man U, mainly coming on as a sub..how many goals did Hwang score at Leipzig. So you would choose Hwang over Lingard? How old is Mout now again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top