Paddingtonwolf
Flaming Galah
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 78,204
- Reaction score
- 8,413
While that is true to an extent, you are not really being fair. You need to add the thirty seconds you have to get a play off to every play where the clock is still running. This isn't a game like our football so ball in play times are comparing apples and oranges.Just did a mad calculation which is certainly open to correction..
Now I know I'm only looking at a couple of players here, and I know, I know they do an awful lot of other stuff during the week whilst representing the club, but you know in our football out of a 'ninety minute' game there's only about 65-70 minutes of actual football, (in the crowd, dead ball etc etc) but I saw a stat that in a NFL game on average, whilst the game is played over 4 x 15 minutes quarters, there's only about 11 minutes of actual football in a 60 minute game.
So if Aaron Rodgers or whoever there are (I think 2 or 3 others in spitting distance of that $50 million salary), is on 50 mill, and he plays an actual 11 minute game (gets calculator out...)
20 games x 11 minutes = 220 mins / 3.666 hrs. per season.
$50 mill / 3.666 hrs = $13.64million per hour... or $227,000 per minute.
Not bad really, but yes that's only getting to the Superbowl, but even so.
The way to push that number up is to give teams infinite time outs which would a) make every game last eight hours to play, and b) utterly ruin the dynamic as time pressure is what decides games.