No, just no. Everything here is all levels of wrong.I know it'll never happen, but my radical idea for making the game safer would be to remove facemasks from helmets. If a player thought he was going to lose his teeth and get the shape of his nose rearraged while making a tackle he's probably think twice about leading with his head. I'd also bring in a rule from rugby that penalises 'no arms' tackles. Form tackling is taught for a reason, it's safer and more affective.
I think you'd detract from the game itself if you take out the aggression and physicality of itSpot on; although I generally agree that the game needs to be made even safer still, we're having to undo nearly a hundred years of football culture that was built around inhuman physicality. It could be years (or decades) before the defensive side of the game catches up.
In this case the opposite rule would have to apply at the line of scrimmage, as wrapping up en route to a pancake block is always going to get a holding flag thrown.What are you classing as a tackle though? If an OT pancakes a DT in protection is that a tackle, because they can be some of the most brutal and enjoyable hits, or are you just talking about people who have the ball?
I don't think wrapping would make any difference in the NFL. The forces are too great and the pads are weaponised as it is.
The tackling aspect of the game has been improved measurably by reducing head hits, blindside blocks and tackles, late hits and leading with the helmet.
One of the big reason wrapping works in rugby is the lack of protection the players wear so not wrapping leads to a block on an unguarded player. That doesn't happen in the NFL.
Exactly, it's a crap shoot.