Elephant Pyjamas
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,376
- Reaction score
- 10,085
A number of these goals are excellent, but he's a shadow of this player now.
We're always waiting for better though aren't we? They said exactly that in the summer.
As Del said its really disappointing if the sum of our amazing scouting network is Broja, Adams and Ings (if that does turn out to be the case) Barry from Gornal could have suggested those 3.
Yeah so would I, but the optics don't suggest that.I'd bet good money that they've scouted a lot more than these.
Even that loan fizzled out badly, only 2 goals after Christmas. 6 goals in a season is pretty shit for a regular striker in a mid-table team, Fabio got 4 in his first season here and no-one would call that impressive.A number of these goals are excellent, but he's a shadow of this player now.
Yeah so would I, but the optics don't suggest that.
I'm sure they said in the summer that it was difficult to get a striker over the line it is a tough window etc...and they'll say the same again.
In fact that's been said a number of times, Moxey loved it.
Our expectations are continually dampened.
However there is a week or so left, so let's see.
They said that in the summer though, that's my point! Where does it end?But I don't see the point of getting worked up about getting a striker in when it's really not THAT essential? It would be nice, but I'd much rather wait for a window that will see more opportunities to get the right player (and character) in.
I would want an Option not Obligation to buy. At say £25MI should have clarified, I'd only sign Broja on loan, but all the talk is a permanent deal, and the figures quoted are ridiculous.
I prefer the word resignedYou're all so bloody understanding and nice
True.It really isn’t just us this window though, there’s barely been any signings at all.
Plus they want to get it done before everyone realises that he's shite.But that should also mean clubs are willing to sell so they don't fall foul of it - in Chelsea's case I guess that's why they're hawking Broja as he'll represent an excellent profit as a youth player.
I think that might be too late.Plus they want to get it done before everyone realises that he's shite.
I think you are going to see more of it, not to make profit just redistribute it to meet the regulations. Not like for like players, but City selling Palmer to cover Nunes and plenty of others from an FFP perspective being an example. Chelsea may well sell Gallagher in the Summer which wouldn't be for football reasons from their perspective.That’s Chelsea’s whole model, they have a conveyor belt of academy players they keep selling that makes pure profit and then they can spread the cost of incomings over long contracts.
Seems a bit backwards to me that the rules encourage teams to sell their home grown academy players over foreign imports
Agreed.Seems a bit backwards to me that the rules encourage teams to sell their home grown academy players over foreign imports
I think you are going to see more of it, not to make profit just redistribute it to meet the regulations. Not like for like players, but City selling Palmer to cover Nunes and plenty of others from an FFP perspective being an example. Chelsea may well sell Gallagher in the Summer which wouldn't be for football reasons from their perspective.